Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #1412
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST          Monday, September 9 2002          Volume 01 : Number 1412

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 17:41:58 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] YesNIC hoarding joesworld.com

Vittorio and all assembly members,

  No kidding Vittorio!  This has only been hashed and re-hashed
along the lines that John states below as well as the privacy issues
with Whois for about 2 years now.  Where have you been Vittorio?

Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> Well - if this, as it seems, is really a bug about the WHOIS clauses
> in the Registrar Agreement, I think the WHOIS Task Force should
> definitely propose a patch to it in its final report.
>
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 21:46:35 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >
> >> John Berryhill writes:
> >>
> >> "But that's the beauty of the game, Ross."
> >>
> >> This would seem to suggest that the creation of an abundant number of
> >> distinct accredited parties to compete for the artificially limited number
> >> of second level domains was for the purpose of speculation.
> >
> >It was merely a reflection of my unending wonder at human creativity.  Given
> >a piece of sloppy contract drafting, it is amazing what people can come up
> >with.  But, maybe I'm wrong, maybe someone slipped that odd "active"
> >limitation on domain names for which whois data is required, for some other
> >reason not immediately apparent.
> >
> >One can marvel at the beauty of an ant, but it is still an icky bug.
>
> --
> vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
> ----------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <--------------------------
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 17:57:31 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Re: 0:190     ORG [ORGY]

Jim and all,

  Thank you Jim for your comments and excellent observations here.

  I also along with our[INEGRoup] members would like to hear
more specifics from Joe Clark regarding the .ORG reassignment
as well as the process by which that reassignment was determined.

  To many in the DNSO GA, NCDNHC as well as the Atlarge, it
would appear that the reassignment of .ORG was long ago preordained.
To our members this seems like a flim-flam job on the stakeholders/users
and is on shaky legal ground as well...

Jim Fleming wrote:

> http://forum.icann.org/cgi-bin/rpgmessage.cgi?org;3D764D0D00000217
>
> "Jim Clarke is Senior Vice President for Public Policy and Strategic Relations at the Washington, D.C.-based American Society of
> Association Executives (ASAE), which has 25,000 association executive and supplier members representing approximately 11,000
> associations in the U.S. and in 50 countries worldwide. Email: [email-masked]. Address: ASAE, 1575 I Street NW, Washington, DC
> 20005."
>
> "My purpose here is two-fold.  First, I want to applaud ICANN's policy of bringing competition to the domain-name industry.  Second,
> I want to suggest a few broad principles that should guide ICANN as it evaluates the merits of the various .ORG reassignment
> proposals."
>
> ==========
>
> Are you talking about the second 32-bit DNS .ORG Mirror Registry ?
> ....or the new 128-bit DNS .ORG Registry....
>
> The decisions have already been made about the 32-bit DNS Registries.
>
> It would be nice to see the .ORG Community have something to say about the
> 128-bit DNS Registry services and provider, but that may not likely happen
> given the way the 32-bit DNS decisions have been made...
>
> Jim Fleming
> 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...IPv16 is even closer...
> http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> http://ipv8.yi.org
> http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> http://ipv8.no-ip.org
> http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> 0:190     ORG [ORGY]

Regards,
- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 22:39:25 +0200
From: "DNSO Secretariat" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Wednesday, 9-11-02: Transfer TF call: open to interested parties to provide comments and dialogue with TF regarding draft recommendations

[To: [email-masked], [email-masked]]
[To: [email-masked]]

On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, the Transfer Task Force call will be open
to interested participants for a discussion on the draft recommendations
regarding transfers.

THIS IS NOT INTENDED IN ANY WAY TO REPLACE PUBLIC COMMENT, BUT IS AN EFFORT
TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO DISCUSS QUESTIONS AND
ISSUES WITH THE TASK FORCE.
The open portion of the call will begin at 2:30 EST p.m.
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/

The drafting team is planning to post their draft on Tuesday to the TR-TF
list, so that all can have a chance to see it before the call. However, we
understand that some may also have specific questions.

IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO RSVP FOR THE CALL SO WE CAN GET ENOUGH PORTS.

PLEASE RSVP TO THE [email-masked] VIA EMAIL.
WE WILL ADD IN CONFERENCE PORTS ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF RSVP'S RECEIVED.

This section of the call will be scheduled for one hour and 30 minutes, so
that the TF can complete some additional work as well in the remaining 30
minutes of their scheduled time.

We will hold at least one more, and possibly two more open calls, depending
on the interest we receive.  This notice is being sent to the constituency
and GA list by the DNSO Secretariat.

Again, this is not intended to replace public comment but to inform the TF
of additional views and perspectives while we are in the process of
developing and finalizing draft recommendations.

Best regards,
Marilyn Cade

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 18:26:55 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Wednesday, 9-11-02: Transfer TF call: open to interested parties to provide comments and dialogue with TF regarding draft recommendations

Deare secretariat and all assembly members,

  If this is a conference phone call, I would be very interested.

DNSO Secretariat wrote:

> [To: [email-masked], [email-masked]]
> [To: [email-masked]]
>
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, the Transfer Task Force call will be open
> to interested participants for a discussion on the draft recommendations
> regarding transfers.
>
> THIS IS NOT INTENDED IN ANY WAY TO REPLACE PUBLIC COMMENT, BUT IS AN EFFORT
> TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO DISCUSS QUESTIONS AND
> ISSUES WITH THE TASK FORCE.
> The open portion of the call will begin at 2:30 EST p.m.
> For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
>
> The drafting team is planning to post their draft on Tuesday to the TR-TF
> list, so that all can have a chance to see it before the call. However, we
> understand that some may also have specific questions.
>
> IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO RSVP FOR THE CALL SO WE CAN GET ENOUGH PORTS.
>
> PLEASE RSVP TO THE [email-masked] VIA EMAIL.
> WE WILL ADD IN CONFERENCE PORTS ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF RSVP'S RECEIVED.
>
> This section of the call will be scheduled for one hour and 30 minutes, so
> that the TF can complete some additional work as well in the remaining 30
> minutes of their scheduled time.
>
> We will hold at least one more, and possibly two more open calls, depending
> on the interest we receive.  This notice is being sent to the constituency
> and GA list by the DNSO Secretariat.
>
> Again, this is not intended to replace public comment but to inform the TF
> of additional views and perspectives while we are in the process of
> developing and finalizing draft recommendations.
>
> Best regards,
> Marilyn Cade
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #1412
*************************