Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #1308
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST            Monday, July 1 2002            Volume 01 : Number 1308

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 20:51:36 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

Eric and all assembly members,

  Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
"Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...

[email-masked] wrote:

> I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> change anything within the GA.
>
> Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> fashion.
>
> Anything else would be uncivilized.
>
> Eric
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 20:17:41 -0700
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?

Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
>   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
>
> [email-masked] wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > change anything within the GA.
> >
> > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > fashion.
> >
> > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [email-masked]
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:59:46 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

Eric and all assembly members,

  Actually, to answer your question, yes, plain enough, but not quite
complete enough.

  If the ICANN BoD has voted to adopt the "Blueprint", or
as our members characterize it as the "Black-and-Blueprint"
than DOC/NTIA, not DOC BTW, will as in the past thus far
also adopt this "Black-and-Blueprint" unless there is such
an uprising from members here and from many other groups,
constituencies of the DNSO, the ASO/PSO members,
the NIC's, ISP's, ccTLD's independently and on mass,
and frankly many many stakeholders/users/domain name
holders, there will be no reverse from WITHIN ICANN
here...

  Given this than, change will have to come strictly from
without...  So, DNSO GA members is loosing one more
important battle baring a miracle, but the war rages on...

[email-masked] wrote:

> I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
> internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
> should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
> before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
> of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
> TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
> under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?
>
> Eric
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Eric and all assembly members,
> >
> >   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> > Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> > "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
> >
> > [email-masked] wrote:
> >
> > > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > > change anything within the GA.
> > >
> > > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > > fashion.
> > >
> > > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:31:55 -0700
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

perhaps you missed my post for outcry?
Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
>   Actually, to answer your question, yes, plain enough, but not quite
> complete enough.
>
>   If the ICANN BoD has voted to adopt the "Blueprint", or
> as our members characterize it as the "Black-and-Blueprint"
> than DOC/NTIA, not DOC BTW, will as in the past thus far
> also adopt this "Black-and-Blueprint" unless there is such
> an uprising from members here and from many other groups,
> constituencies of the DNSO, the ASO/PSO members,
> the NIC's, ISP's, ccTLD's independently and on mass,
> and frankly many many stakeholders/users/domain name
> holders, there will be no reverse from WITHIN ICANN
> here...
>
>   Given this than, change will have to come strictly from
> without...  So, DNSO GA members is loosing one more
> important battle baring a miracle, but the war rages on...
>
> [email-masked] wrote:
>
> > I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
> > internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
> > should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
> > before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
> > of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
> > TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
> > under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Eric and all assembly members,
> > >
> > >   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> > > Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> > > "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
> > >
> > > [email-masked] wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > > > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > > > change anything within the GA.
> > > >
> > > > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > > > fashion.
> > > >
> > > > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [email-masked]
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 00:33:13 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

Eric and all assembly members,

  Yes I saw it.  However one post on outcry by one assembly member,
does not an outcry make.  Perhaps you should be a little more
proactive and register outcry.org and do something with it?  Or perhaps
you can go to NYC and the Hackers conference on July 12-14
and make a REAL "Outcry" presentation.  See:
http://store.yahoo.com/2600hacker/h2k2hope2002.html
or http://h2k2.net/panels.html
I see that several of our [INEGroups] more noted members are listed...

[email-masked] wrote:

> perhaps you missed my post for outcry?
> Eric
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Eric and all assembly members,
> >
> >   Actually, to answer your question, yes, plain enough, but not quite
> > complete enough.
> >
> >   If the ICANN BoD has voted to adopt the "Blueprint", or
> > as our members characterize it as the "Black-and-Blueprint"
> > than DOC/NTIA, not DOC BTW, will as in the past thus far
> > also adopt this "Black-and-Blueprint" unless there is such
> > an uprising from members here and from many other groups,
> > constituencies of the DNSO, the ASO/PSO members,
> > the NIC's, ISP's, ccTLD's independently and on mass,
> > and frankly many many stakeholders/users/domain name
> > holders, there will be no reverse from WITHIN ICANN
> > here...
> >
> >   Given this than, change will have to come strictly from
> > without...  So, DNSO GA members is loosing one more
> > important battle baring a miracle, but the war rages on...
> >
> > [email-masked] wrote:
> >
> > > I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
> > > internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
> > > should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
> > > before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
> > > of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
> > > TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
> > > under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > Jeff Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > Eric and all assembly members,
> > > >
> > > >   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> > > > Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> > > > "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
> > > >
> > > > [email-masked] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > > > > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > > > > change anything within the GA.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > > > > fashion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eric
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > --
> > > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > > > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

Regards,
- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:41:00 -0700
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] Change from without and within

Well Jeff you are starting to get the point.
Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
>   Yes I saw it.  However one post on outcry by one assembly member,
> does not an outcry make.  Perhaps you should be a little more
> proactive and register outcry.org and do something with it?  Or perhaps
> you can go to NYC and the Hackers conference on July 12-14
> and make a REAL "Outcry" presentation.  See:
> http://store.yahoo.com/2600hacker/h2k2hope2002.html
> or http://h2k2.net/panels.html
> I see that several of our [INEGroups] more noted members are listed...
>
> [email-masked] wrote:
>
> > perhaps you missed my post for outcry?
> > Eric
> >
> > Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Eric and all assembly members,
> > >
> > >   Actually, to answer your question, yes, plain enough, but not quite
> > > complete enough.
> > >
> > >   If the ICANN BoD has voted to adopt the "Blueprint", or
> > > as our members characterize it as the "Black-and-Blueprint"
> > > than DOC/NTIA, not DOC BTW, will as in the past thus far
> > > also adopt this "Black-and-Blueprint" unless there is such
> > > an uprising from members here and from many other groups,
> > > constituencies of the DNSO, the ASO/PSO members,
> > > the NIC's, ISP's, ccTLD's independently and on mass,
> > > and frankly many many stakeholders/users/domain name
> > > holders, there will be no reverse from WITHIN ICANN
> > > here...
> > >
> > >   Given this than, change will have to come strictly from
> > > without...  So, DNSO GA members is loosing one more
> > > important battle baring a miracle, but the war rages on...
> > >
> > > [email-masked] wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
> > > > internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
> > > > should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
> > > > before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
> > > > of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
> > > > TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
> > > > under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Eric and all assembly members,
> > > > >
> > > > >   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> > > > > Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> > > > > "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
> > > > >
> > > > > [email-masked] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > > > > > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > > > > > change anything within the GA.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > > > > > fashion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eric
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > > > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > > > > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [email-masked]
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:55:34 -0700
From: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] Invigoration

The GA needs to re-assert itself not redesign itself.

Eric

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:24:22 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: news from bucharest: at large exists again

On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:27:30 -0700, you wrote:

>I believe based upon experience and a long history this is naive.

I think we can have counter-proof of this: just let any organization you
trust (including Jefsey's ones) ask Denise Michel for inclusion in the ALOC,
and let's see what she answers.
- -- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo vb.
Vittorio Bertola     <[email-masked]>    Ph. +39 011 23381220
Vitaminic [The Music Evolution] - Vice President for Technology

DISCLAIMER, PLEASE NOTE: This communication is intended only for use by the
addressee. It may contain confidential or privileged information. 
Transmission, distribution and/or copy cannot be permitted. Please notify
immediately the sender by replying if you are not the intended recipient.
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 20:47:16 +0200
From: "J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: news from bucharest: at large exists again

- --=======7E7243A2=======
Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-31E87010; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 19:24 30/06/02, Vittorio Bertola said:
>I think we can have counter-proof of this: just let any organization you
>trust (including Jefsey's ones) ask Denise Michel for inclusion in the ALOC,
>and let's see what she answers.

I am sorry, Vittorio, but I did and so did germany@large. I suppose we are 
of no interest. There are many others, to start with Karls one. We known 
from the very beginning that this was twisted and pure sales oriented 
politicking. I am not interested in Joe Simsing, I am interested in the 
Internet.

I mean in having people and e-businesses serviced through a common network 
they understand, use and control. My organization from now one will be only 
oriented towards this. For the French, for the Italians, for the Europeans, 
for the Chineses and Indians and Aussies and Yankees and Vietnameses. If 
ICANNers want join they are welcome as long as they behave themselves. I 
proposed you and others many times to move ahead, I think that time has 
come. If you want to contribute with work and funding hunt you welcome. The 
only good news is that true internet operations have a cost but not a big 
one and have a return, not a big one, but have one. If you want to speak 
about PHP, on-line machines etc. you welcome.
jfc

- --=======7E7243A2=======--

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:19:07 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] In memoriam page: Peter de Blanc

[ cf. http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/ ]

ICANN/DNSO 

In memoriam: Peter de Blanc 
17 November 1944 - 26 June 2002
 
Peter de Blanc, un grand Monsieur 

Peter de Blanc's last will and testament to the ccTLD community 
and ICANN: CCDP - cc Development Project Foundation 

   http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/PdB-lastwill-and-testament.html 

   http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/PdB-CCDP-MoU.html 

ICANN Board resolution, 28 June 2002 

   http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-28jun02.htm 
   local copy http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-28jun02.htm 

Peter de Blanc's Obituary 

   http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/PdB-obituary.html 

Autobiography, April 2000 

   http://www.islands.vi/~pdeblanc/ 
   local copy http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/www.islands.vi/pdeblanc/ 

US Virgin Islands mourning the loss of Peter J. de Blanc 

   www.viaccess.net/press/deblanc.html 
   local copy http://www.dnso.org/inmemoriam/www.viaccess.net/press/deblanc.html 
- --
... to be completed with pictures and summary of his work at ICANN/DNSO/ccTLD
- --

Elisabeth Porteneuve
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #1308
*************************