[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [liaison7c] Structure Task Force - request for Constituency positions
Dear DNSO Secretariats:
Here is the opinion of ccTLD Constituency for the ALSC report.
----------------------------------------------------
ccTLD comments on ALSC report:
1. ccTLD does not agree that membership should be based on domain name
registration. In the event that At-Large membership is based on domain
name registration, ccTLDs may not be required to provide whois,
database, or other information, or in any way increase their cost or
administrative overheads.
2. ccTLD agrees that the AT-Large should be self organized and
self-funding.
If there is a fee for membership or voting, ccTLD should not be
required to collect those fee.
3. Number of directors: ccTLD has no comment.
Note: We also agreed that, if any specific ccTLD wished to become more
actively involved in the At-Large election process, they are free to do so.
------------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
ByungKyu Kim
Executive Director
ccTLD Secretariat
----- Original Message -----
From: "DNSO Secretariat" <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org>
To: <liaison7c@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:31 PM
Subject: [liaison7c] Structure Task Force - request for Constituency
positions
> Dear Constituency Secretariats,
> the Names Council task force on structure will start work shortly. To help
with
> this in the first instance please send to me copies of any Constituency
position
> papers you have the At-Large Study Committee report.
> Many thanks.
>
> Philip Sheppard