| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the WHOIS TF Final Report
To: "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>, "NC-WHOIS (E-mail)" <nc-whois@dnso.org>Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the WHOIS TF Final ReportFrom: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:33:58 -0500Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.orgThread-Index: AcLbzZmDwAKz1AFiSkajrlhk9alkIwAOx4VwThread-Topic: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the Whois TF Final Report 
 One 
thing that concerns me also is that it is "easy" but also unfair to characterize 
all concerns about keeping WHOIS available as driven by trademark, patent, and 
copyright lobbies. Consumers use WHOIS to see who is behind a web site their 
child visits, businesses check out suppliers, etc. Privacy issues for a 
business, or an organization, or someone who is conducting commerce on the 
Internet may be very different than someone who is indeed an 
individual.   As a  Task Force, let's keep an 
 open 
mind as we examine the issues related to privacy and WHOIS, and try to stay 
focused on our task of looking at the range of questions.     
  
  
  I just ran into this 
  and walked away surprised that the entire report would be desupported due to 
  one component that was clearly planned to be addressed.-ram Tucows Comments on the Whois TF Final ReportPosted by ross at February 17, 2003 12:07 PMTo get completely to the point, we don't support the report because it 
  misses its mark.  The brief summary is: - We reject the report because it decouples the primary issue of privacy 
  from the secondary issues and therefore unduly benefits the trademark, 
  copyright and patent lobbies.- there are some portions of the report that 
  we support.
 - there are some portions of the report that we don't 
  support
 - All of these portions must be dealt with in the context of 
  privacy and regard for the customer, not the lawyers.
   
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |