RE: [nc-whois] Revised Bulk Access Draft
Title: RE: [nc-whois] Revised Bulk Access Draft Sorry for posting so late. It is quite difficult for me at present to follow all these e-mail communications. Ok, now regarding the substance: I agree with steve and do not think it is wise to write a sentence on any future conflict between national laws and the bulk access provisions of the RAA. I refer to the sentence: [To the extent that implementation of the RAA's WHOIS provisions by a contracted party ...]. If there is a consensus on this sentence, I think that it should at least be limited to bulk access. In any case, still, I think it is unwise for the Task Force to make such general statements about abstract conflicts in such complex area of law. Laurence -----Original Message-----
From my point of view, the open issues include Thomas's proposed
-----Original Message-----
On 2002-11-22 13:40:25 -0000, Karen Elizaga wrote: > Thanks, everyone, for your comments. Again, I have tried to
This is mostly fine. Thanks a lot, Karen! I'm attaching a version with a number of small changes included
- In the sentence "The Task Force has not ruled out elimination...",
- I have included Abel with the dissenting opinion. - I have included a variant of Abel's proposed wording below
The single open question from my point of view is, right now,
Thanks again,
|