<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: FW: [nc-whois] Revised Draft on Bulk Access
This is the only part of Thomas' proposals that I have a real problem with:
-
- I have a concern with Steve's deletion of the "Clearly, there
cannot be" paragraph. I have added alternative language which is
more focused to the WHOIS provisions than Karen's original
suggestion.
-
The whole question of potential conflicts between national/local law and
contractual obligations is an extremely complex one. I do not think that
this group adds anything helpful to this issue by making a general and
abstract pronouncement on the subject. It is enough to recognize that
"national laws may have implications as to what information [a registrar,
etc.] can and cannot provide" via Whois.
Steve Metalitz
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|