[nc-whois] 11:00 a.m. call for WHOIS TF only

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I no longer have administrative support to provide scheduling for the TF calls. 

So, I'm using my personal bridge for tomorrow's one hour call: 

The dial in for Wed. call at 11:00 A.M> EST is 

918-583-3261
Part. Code:  681-429

there is no dial out from the operator available, nor is transcription available. 
Can I get a volunteer to bridge on anyone outside of the country who needs that support?
I'll dial Tony myself.
The call will last one hour. When I drop off, the call will end. I have to leave at 12.00 p.m.

Please stay tuned. IF I get some staff support, I can replace this bridge with one with 
*dial out
* transcription
AND the ability to continue on the bridge after I leave.

THAT number will be posted tomorrow BY 10, IF available.

Otherwise, use the number above. The purpose of tomorrow's call is to focus in on Item 4. 


MC

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Metalitz [mailto:metalitz@iipa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; Thomas Roessler; Steve Metalitz
Cc: Ken Stubbs; Kristy McKee; Juliano,Marie M - LGA; andrews@epic.org;
gcore@wanadoo.fr; Laurence Djolakian; Troy_Dow@MPAA.org;
kelizaga@gnr.com; gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com; baf@fausett.com;
harris@cabase.org.ar; rmohan@afilias.info; hakik@sdnbd.org;
orobles@nic.mx; abel@able-towers.com; marilynscade@hotmail.com;
tmdenton@magma.ca
Subject: RE: DRAFT revision of accuracy recommendations


Is a call-in number for tomorrow available yet?  

-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Thomas Roessler; Steve Metalitz
Cc: Ken Stubbs; Kristy McKee; Juliano,Marie M - LGA; andrews@epic.org;
gcore@wanadoo.fr; Laurence Djolakian; Troy_Dow@MPAA.org;
kelizaga@gnr.com; gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com; baf@fausett.com;
harris@cabase.org.ar; rmohan@afilias.info; hakik@sdnbd.org;
orobles@nic.mx; abel@able-towers.com; marilynscade@hotmail.com;
tmdenton@magma.ca
Subject: RE: DRAFT revision of accuracy recommendations


I've invited the chair of the deletes TF to talk to  us next Monday for 20
minutes. No need to worry about turf wars... :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Steve Metalitz
Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; Ken Stubbs; Kristy McKee; Juliano,Marie M -
LGA; andrews@epic.org; gcore@wanadoo.fr; Laurence Djolakian;
Troy_Dow@MPAA.org; kelizaga@gnr.com; gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com;
baf@fausett.com; harris@cabase.org.ar; rmohan@afilias.info;
hakik@sdnbd.org; orobles@nic.mx; abel@able-towers.com;
marilynscade@hotmail.com; 'tmdenton@magma.ca'
Subject: Re: DRAFT revision of accuracy recommendations


I have no interest in a turf battle (and I'm not on any other task  
force).

However, this is something on the mid-time scale for this task  
force, and apparently on the near-time scale for deletes, so it may  
be reasonable to leave it to them - in particular when they are (or  
seem to be?) digging into it deeper than what we can currently do.

But maybe our chairs and liaisons to the deletes TF can provide some 
advice and better insight into this?

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>





On 2002-11-19 09:19:00 -0500, Steve Metalitz wrote:
>Envelope-to: roessler@does-not-exist.info
>Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:19:07 +0100
>From: Steve Metalitz <metalitz@iipa.com>
>To: 'Thomas Roessler' <roessler@does-not-exist.org>,
>	Steve Metalitz <metalitz@iipa.com>
>Cc: Marilyn Cade <mcade@att.com>, Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net>,
>	Kristy McKee <k@widgital.com>,
>	"Juliano,Marie M - LGA" <mjuliano@att.com>, andrews@epic.org,
>	gcore@wanadoo.fr, Laurence Djolakian <Laurence_Djolakian@MPAA.org>,
>	Troy_Dow@MPAA.org, kelizaga@gnr.com, gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com,
>	baf@fausett.com, harris@cabase.org.ar, rmohan@afilias.info,
>	hakik@sdnbd.org, orobles@nic.mx, abel@able-towers.com,
>	marilynscade@hotmail.com, "'tmdenton@magma.ca'" <tmdenton@magma.ca>
>Subject: RE: DRAFT revision of accuracy recommendations
>Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:19:00 -0500
>X-No-Spam: whitelist
>
>I agree with Thomas's last sentence but don't see why we need to change the
>preceding sentence.  Let's not get drawn into a turf battle with another
>task force but just give our recommendation on the issues we have been
asked
>to look at.     
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:47 AM
>To: Steve Metalitz
>Cc: Marilyn Cade; Ken Stubbs; Kristy McKee; Juliano,Marie M - LGA;
>andrews@epic.org; gcore@wanadoo.fr; Laurence Djolakian;
>Troy_Dow@MPAA.org; kelizaga@gnr.com; gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com;
>baf@fausett.com; harris@cabase.org.ar; rmohan@afilias.info;
>hakik@sdnbd.org; orobles@nic.mx; abel@able-towers.com;
>marilynscade@hotmail.com; 'tmdenton@magma.ca'
>Subject: Re: DRAFT revision of accuracy recommendations
>
>
>On 2002-11-18 17:56:34 -0500, Steve Metalitz wrote:
>
>>Thomas' proposed changes look reasonable to me.  I am not sure any 
>>changes are needed in the texts he has marked in yellow.  
>
>I just had a look at Jordyn Buchanan's excellent minutes of the 
>Deletes Task Force's latest conference call, at  
><http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-deletes/Arc00/msg00030.html>.
>
>Accoding to these minutes, the deletes task force is currently in  
>the process of investigating how standard redemption mechanisms  
>should apply to deletions caused by WHOIS accuracy inquiries.
>
>Consequently, the last sentence of (8) (a) (In my edits: "When such  
>registrations are deleted after the end of the hold period, standard 
>redemption mechanisms should only be applicable provided that  
>accurate and verified contact information is made available.")  
>should be replaced by a reference to the deletes task force.  
>
>Suggested wording: "When such registrations are deleted after the  
>end of the hold period, standard redemption mechanisms should only  
>be applicable with safeguards appropriate for the specific  
>circumstances of the deletion.  The details of this question are  
>under investigation in the Names Council's deletes task force."
>
>Redline attached for your convenience.
>-- 
>Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>