[nc-whois] CONFERENCE CALL

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

I never got the call, so I assume at the time of call I was "out of
reach" (yes it even happens in these parts of the world)
I would however appreciate a quick rundown on the talk, can anyone
provide some notes ?

Regards

Abel


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-whois@dnso.org] On Behalf
Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: 14 November 2002 12:27
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] editorial question


Thinking about our work plan, I have a question: Do we really have 
to produce a comprehensive all-4-issues-report until the week of 
November 24?

An alternative I could think of would be to limit the "official"  
November 24 report to the "low-hanging fruits" - this should allow  
us to streamline our work on that report very much, and to reduce  
its volume.

Under the assumption (!) that only the low-hanging fruits require a  
Names Council vote in Amsterdam, we could then slightly later  
produce a second report on the remaining issues (as far as we have  
material on them) which would mainly try to give a systematic  
overview of the possible policy options we have encountered, and of  
the comments and inputs received during our conference calls and  
through the comment period.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>