RE: [nc-whois] our report

[Steve Metalitz <metalitz@iipa.com>]

Task Force members should be aware that what Kristy posted Monday night is
not identical to the text that was posted by the DNSO secretariat and on
which comments are now being taken.  For example, the latter includes a
section VI summarizing comments received through August, which does not
appear in what Kristy posted.  There may be other differences of which I am
unaware.  Perhaps someone can enlighten us.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Metalitz [mailto:metalitz@iipa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: 'k@widgital.com'; nc-whois@dnso.org
Cc: 'marilynscade@hotmail.com'
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] our report


Since I have already received requests from outside the TF for the draft
report, perhaps the status of what Kristy has posted should be clarified.  I
note that it contains changes to the previously circulated output of at
least three of the four working groups.  I assume that she has posted it so
that Task Force members can review it before the draft "goes final."  Is
this assumption correct?  If so, by what deadline should we provide comments
or suggested changes?  I would suggest Friday, October 18 as a deadline but
obviously this is up to our co-chairs. 

Steve Metalitz

-----Original Message-----
From: k@widgital.com [mailto:k@widgital.com]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:05 PM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] our report


This is our DRAFT report in its most recent format posted on behalf of
Marilyn.

Thank you,