Re: [nc-whois] "accuracy"

[Bret Fausett <baf@fausett.com>]

John's suggestion that we define what we mean by terms like "inaccurate" and
"false" is a good one. As I read the results, I think the intent is to
address situations in which the data is so erroneous that it prevents the
registrant from being contacted.

  -- Bret 

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> John Berryhill has an important comment on the interim report,
> available at
> <http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-whois/Arc01/msg00003.html>.
> 
> His point:  There's more than just one idea on what constitutes
> inaccurate data.