<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-whois] background for GA meeting
Thomas, this is an excellent summary. I would only add, in the first item
of the last set of bullets, the words "and/or improved" just before the
question mark. While most of the recommendations of team 1 concern improved
enforcement of existing agreements, a few recommend that revisions of the
agreements be considered to improve accuracy.
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 3:35 PM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] background for GA meeting
I'm currently preparing some brief background information for the
sessions which are going to happen during the GA in Shanghai; among
these sessions will be a presentation of the WHOIS task force.
If you have any issues with the attached draft, please let me know
ASAP.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|