<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-whois] baskets...
Thomas,
This is an excellent listing of suitable baskets.
In going through my batch of 200 responses (part of the 3000,
and not the statistical 300), I found a couple of things that
might be added:
Question 7 (How harmed)
---------------------------
The subtitle might be more precise if it reads:
"Inability to contact right party on following issues"
I would add the following to the list of issues:
- Missed domain name purchasing opportunities (expiry data problem)
Question 7 (Improvements)
----------------------------
I would add "periodically" to "validate data"
Question 8.1 (Inadequate)
--------------------------
I would add:
- Domain name history (previous owners/dates)
- For Sale availability of domain name where holder so indicates.
Question 8.1 (Unnecessary)
Comment - "Contact should only be available as some kind of
second-level enquiry, so that it is not easily available". (This is
an interesting suggestion, and is currently applied in the Chile NIC)
Question 13
-------------
I would add:
- ICANN regulation/International treaty
Good work !!!
Regards
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: <nc-whois@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:07 PM
Subject: [nc-whois] baskets...
> Please find attached the current list of baskets we suggest for the
> remaining free-form questions; this includes modifications to the
> baskets used in the preliminary report for questions 8.1 and 10.
> Abel will follow up with baskets for question 20 later on.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|