<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-udrp] Fw: <bloombert.com> Domain Name Dispute]
John Berryhill has penned a very convincing account of why this seemingly
reasonable idea is in fact quite misguided if not outright dangerous (it
violates basic contract principles and can work substantial confusion and
injustice). I seem to have mislaid my copy -- John, could you send one to
this list please?
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Antonio Harris wrote:
> This would appear to be a reasonable request
>
> > > Accordingly, we respectfully request that ICANN amend the UDRP to
> > > require registrars to "freeze" disputed domain names while they are
> > > pending decisions in order to avoid scenarios like this one, in which
> > > our client will be forced to incur additional expenses in preparing a
> > > new complaint and is experiencing undue delays in recovering the
> > > disputed domain name.
> > >
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's warm here.<--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|