<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0{\fonttbl{\f0\fmodern\fcharset0 Courier New;}{\f1\fswiss\fprq2 Arial;}{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\lang1033\f0\fs20\objattph\'20\par
\par
here is a copy of my response to the questionnaire which I saved (together with my answers) in case it is of any use. It shows all 56 questions\par
\par
Katrina\par
\par
\pard\li360\cf0\protect\f1\fs16 -----Original Message-----\par
\protect0\pard\protect\fi-1440\li1800\tx1440\b From:\tab\b0 Chicoine, Caroline G. [SMTP:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]\par
\b Sent:\tab\b0 Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:49 PM\par
\b To:\tab\b0 'Dinwoodie, Graeme'; Chicoine, Caroline G.; 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton'\par
\b Cc:\tab\b0 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'\par
\b Subject:\tab\b0 RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\protect0\pard\protect\li360\f2\fs24\par
\fs20\par
\cf1 I have sent another reminder to the secretariat that we desperately need this. I asked the Secretariat to forward it directly to \ul nc-udrp@dnso.org\ulnone . Obviously in light of this delay, I cannot expect people to complete their responses by Feb 28th. Once it is distributed, I will post a new deadline. \cf0 \par
\par
\cf1 While I have a hardcopy, anyone who kept a digital version, if they could forward to \ul nc-udrp@dnso.org\ulnone , it would be greatly appreciated.\cf0 \par
-----Original Message-----\par
\b From:\b0 Dinwoodie, Graeme [mailto:GDinwoodie@kentlaw.edu]\par
\b Sent:\b0 Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:24 PM\par
\b To:\b0 'Chicoine, Caroline G.'; 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton'\par
\b Cc:\b0 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'\par
\b Subject:\b0 RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\par
\par
\par
\protect0\pard\protect\li360\sb90 Caroline, \par
Forgive me if I've missed it, but do we have the link to the questionnaire? I'm working on the basis of my own shorthand recollection of the questions, but it would be useful to see the actual document to which responses were made. Thanks \par
Graeme \par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [\ul mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com\ulnone ] \par
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:05 PM \par
To: 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton' \par
Cc: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org' \par
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
Importance: High\par
\par
I have given our Task Force members a Feb 28th deadline to review the \par
responses from the DNSO version questionnaire, but they can no longer find a \par
link to the questionnaire to compare the responses against. Can you please \par
provide us a link asap. \par
Louis, since we do not have the ICANN responses yet, it is not as urgent, \par
but we will need a link to the ICANN version also at some point. \par
Thanks \par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: Chicoine, Caroline G.\par
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:58 AM \par
To: 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton' \par
Cc: 'MSD@tzmm.com' \par
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\par
Glen and Louis, can you email the link where are Task Force members can find \par
each version? Thanks \par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: MSD@tzmm.com [\ul mailto:MSD@tzmm.com\ulnone ] \par
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:47 AM \par
To: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com \par
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\par
Where can we find a copy of the questionnaire? The results are all answers, \par
without the questions. \par
Best regards. \par
M. Scott Donahey \par
Tomlinson Zisko Morosoli & Maser LLP \par
200 Page Mill Rd. \par
Palo Alto, CA 94306 \par
Phone: (650) 325-8666 \par
Fax: (650) 324-1808 \par
msd@tzmm.com \par
www.tzmm.com \par
"This email message is for the sole use of the intended \par
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any \par
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you \par
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and \par
destroy all copies of the original message."\par
\par
\par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com [\ul mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com\ulnone ] \par
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:20 AM \par
To: Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org \par
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\par
I thought long and hard about that, but decided not to put any constraints. \par
I would like everyone's comments to be in a summary fashion that highlights \par
the good, the bad and the suggestions, trying to be as concise as possible. \par
Once we see everyone's summaries, and once we do the same exercise with the \par
ICANN responses, we can discuss the summaries and see if we can put together \par
a report that represents some sort of consensus. \par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: Katrina Burchell [\ul mailto:Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com\ulnone ] \par
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:57 AM \par
To: nc-udrp@dnso.org \par
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\par
Hi \par
Is there any format in which you want our review of the responses for \par
which we are responsible posted? \par
regards \par
Katrina \par
-----Original Message----- \par
From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [SMTP:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com] \par
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:20 AM \par
To: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org' \par
Cc: 'Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us'; 'DNSO Secretariat' \par
Subject: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
Importance: High \par
We are ready to distribute the response we received to the questionnaire \par
from the DNSO website. The responses from the ICANN website will follow in \par
due course. \par
To begin with, there the following four individuals apparently did not \par
receive or respond to my email to confirm that they are in fact receiving \par
email at the nc_udrp@dnso.org email address:\par
\par
gTLD Constituency rep - Jeff Neuman \par
CPR Provider - F. Peter Phillips \par
eResolution Provider - Dr. Joelle Thibault \par
WIPO Provider - Erik Wilbers\par
\par
Jeff, since I received an email from you recently, I am asking the \par
secretariat to confirm that the above email is the email we have of record \par
in our nc-udrp@dnso.org email distribution list. If you would like us to \par
use a different email address, please let us know ASAP. \par
For the others, can their respective panelists try to contact their \par
providers to get a hold of these individuals? \par
In total, except for the three Providers mentioned above, we have 21 \par
members \par
to review the attached responses. All responses per question can be found \par
at \par
\ul http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp1.txt\ulnone \par
Each individual response per questionnaire can be found at \par
\ul http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp2.txt\ulnone \par
While everyone can look at all the responses in whatever format they want, \par
your minimum responsibility is to review the number of the responses from \par
the second link that are assigned to you as set forth below (the number of \par
the response is identified at the top of the record by ##<actual number of \par
response>###########################):\par
\par
Sarah Deutsch #1-8 \par
Neil Duncan Dundas #9-16 \par
Jeff Neuman #17-24 \par
J. Scott Evans #25-32 \par
Antonio Harris #33-40 \par
Michael Froomkin #41-48 \par
Michael Palage #49-56 \par
Katrina Burchell #57-65 \par
M. Scott Donahey #66-73 \par
F. Peter Phillips NONE \par
Ethan Katsh #74-81 \par
Dr. Joelle Thibault NONE \par
James A. Carmody #82-89 \par
Tim Cole #90-98 \par
John Berryhill #99-107 \par
Maxim Waldbaum #108-115 \par
Erik Wilbers NONE \par
Dan Steinberg #116-123 \par
Joon Hyung Hong #124-131 \par
Graeme Dinwoodie #132-140 \par
Erick Iriarte Ahon #141-148 \par
Ramesh Kumar Nadarajah #149-155 \par
I would like everyone to review their responses and provide a summary of \par
their findings within two weeks if possible, which would put us at Feb \par
28th. \par
Please advise Milton or I if you believe you cannot meet this deadline so \par
we \par
\protect0\pard\protect\li360 can either reassign or take on some ourselves. \par
}
UDRP REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE.doc
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|