<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[Fwd: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire]
Caroline,
The raw total number of responses received at the ICANN web site is
222. Based on visually scanning the file sizes, it appears that
approximately 35-40 of these are likely to be empty responses (a small
number of these are also test responses).
Louis
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:20:28 -0600
From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
To: "'Maxim Waldbaum'" <mwaldbaum@salans.com>, nc-udrp@dnso.org
CC: DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org, "'touton@icann.org'" <touton@icann.org>
There were 155 responses received from the DNSO website. I am copying
this
email to Louis to see how many responses ICANN received at tits website.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Waldbaum [mailto:mwaldbaum@salans.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:28 AM
To: nc-udrp@dnso.org; CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com
Cc: DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org; Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us
Subject: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire
how many are we talking about,approximately?mac
>>> "CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com" 02/13/02 07:28PM >>>
We are ready to distribute the response we received to the questionnaire
from the DNSO website. The responses from the ICANN website will follow
in
due course.
To begin with, there the following four individuals apparently did not
receive or respond to my email to confirm that they are in fact
receiving
email at the nc_udrp@dnso.org email address:
gTLD Constituency rep - Jeff Neuman
CPR Provider - F. Peter Phillips
eResolution Provider - Dr. Joelle Thibault
WIPO Provider - Erik Wilbers
Jeff, since I received an email from you recently, I am asking the
secretariat to confirm that the above email is the email we have of
record
in our nc-udrp@dnso.org email distribution list. If you would like us
to
use a different email address, please let us know ASAP.
For the others, can their respective panelists try to contact their
providers to get a hold of these individuals?
In total, except for the three Providers mentioned above, we have 21
members
to review the attached responses. All responses per question can be
found at
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp1.txt
Each individual response per questionnaire can be found at
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp2.txt
While everyone can look at all the responses in whatever format they
want,
your minimum responsibility is to review the number of the responses
from
the second link that are assigned to you as set forth below (the number
of
the response is identified at the top of the record by ##<actual number
of
response>###########################):
Sarah Deutsch #1-8
Neil Duncan Dundas #9-16
Jeff Neuman #17-24
J. Scott Evans #25-32
Antonio Harris #33-40
Michael Froomkin #41-48
Michael Palage #49-56
Katrina Burchell #57-65
M. Scott Donahey #66-73
F. Peter Phillips NONE
Ethan Katsh #74-81
Dr. Joelle Thibault NONE
James A. Carmody #82-89
Tim Cole #90-98
John Berryhill #99-107
Maxim Waldbaum #108-115
Erik Wilbers NONE
Dan Steinberg #116-123
Joon Hyung Hong #124-131
Graeme Dinwoodie #132-140
Erick Iriarte Ahon #141-148
Ramesh Kumar Nadarajah #149-155
I would like everyone to review their responses and provide a summary of
their findings within two weeks if possible, which would put us at Feb
28th.
Please advise Milton or I if you believe you cannot meet this deadline
so we
can either reassign or take on some ourselves.
_________________________________________________________
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone (212-632-5500)
and delete and destroy all copies of the material, including all
copies stored in the recipient's computer, printed or saved to disk.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|