Re: [nc-udrp] UDRP Questionnaire

["J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>]

Milton:

I recently gave a speech at a conference of trademark practitioners and gave
everyone the URL for the questionnaire.  INTA has also circulated a grass
roots mailing to its members requesting participation.

J. Scott Evans
----- Original Message -----
From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
To: <council@dnso.org>; <ga@dnso.org>
Cc: <nc-udrp@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:55 AM
Subject: [nc-udrp] UDRP Questionnaire


> I intend to express these concerns at the
> Names Council meeting today, but for online
> participants I will do it here, also.
>
> 1. We need to do a much better job of publicizing
> the availability of this questionnaire. It is
> a call for public comment but the public
> has no idea it exists, and circulation among
> the small coterie of dnso mailing lists will
> not do the trick.
>
> The NC or ICANN should issue a news release
> that solicits public comment and makes the
> URL for it well known. There are a number of
> reporters who follow ICANN closely who will
> pick this up. It should also be highlighted
> on ICANN's home page.
>
> 2. Flaw in survey form
> On question 13, we ask "who should be
> responsible for the selection of the provider."
> The response should be a check box but
> instead is a ranking from 1 - 5. I found this
> so confusing that I was unable to answer
> the question at all. I suspect many others will
> too. But Q 13 is a crucial question.
>
> In general, our members report finding the
> survey format difficult to understand and use.
>
>
> >>> "DNSO Secretariat" <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org> 11/08/01 15:52 PM >>>
> [To: council@dnso.org]
> [To: ga@dnso.org]
> [To: announce@dnso.org, liaison7c@dnso.org]
> _______________________________________________
>
> Please find below the url for the UDRP Review Questionnaire.
>  http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011107.UDRP-Review-Questionnaire.html
> Please complete the questionnaire online and "submit" at the end.
> Your participation is much appreciated.
> Thank you
>
> DNSO Secretariat
>
>
>