RE: [nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

Can the Secratariat let us know what our options are??  I would like it to
be posted by the meeting in LA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan Katsh [mailto:katsh@legal.umass.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:10 AM
To: Dan Steinberg
Cc: Oscar A. Robles-Garay; DNSO Secretariat; Chicoine, Caroline G.;
council@dnso.org; nc-udrp@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC



> > At 05:34 AM 11/6/2001, DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >
> >> Secretariat proposal :
> >>
> >> May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website,
> >> but to post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to
> >> nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so
> >> that people from the Task force can review the results.
> >> Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail
> >> and to fill in the blanks.
> >> Any comments ?

         I apologize for being late in responding to this issue and there 
have been so many messages on this topic over the last 24 hours that I am 
not even sure I understand what is being proposed or whether something has 
already been decided. I am, however, somewhat concerned about the manner in 
which people are asked to respond to the questionnaire. I guess I had 
assumed that there would be a form on the Web which people filled out, 
clicked on submit, and results in some meaningful format would then be sent 
to us.  A form on the Web with text fields or click boxes is, I believe, 
still somewhat easier for some people than downloading a text or Word file, 
filling it out, and then sending it back. Even if it is not any easier, it 
will take less time and people will factor this into account when thinking 
about whether to fill out the questionnaire. Most relevant to us, however, 
is that data that has been collected via a form, even free text, can be 
given back to us in a format that will be much easier for us to review than 
if we get an email containing every questionnaire that has been filled out.

Ethan


> >>
> >> dnso.org webmaster.
> >>
> >> On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> >> > Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the
> >> ICANN and
> >> > DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I
> >> ask that
> >> > each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and
> >> that Danny
> >> > provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and
> >> I cannot
> >> > get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to
> >> him).
> >> >
> >> > As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in
> >> which we are
> >> > requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was
> >> unsure as to
> >> > whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if
> >> any format
> >> > changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the
> >> repsonse.
> >> > Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor
> >> a certain
> >> > list?  Please advise.
> >> >
> >> > Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators
> >> can then
> >> > translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> >> > translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat,
> >> for
> >> > posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members
> >> advise their
> >> > Constituencies and Danny the GA.
> >> >
> >> > Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of
> >> Reference, I
> >> > noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November
> >> 2-December
> >> > 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be
> >> changed to
> >> > "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it
> >> posted.
> >> > Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to
> >> November
> >> > 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> >> > 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the
> >> entry
> >> > should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> >> > teleconference"
> >> >
> >> > If you have any questions, please let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the
> >> questionnaire.
> >> > Please remember that our work has only just begun.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>
> >
> > Top Level Domain .MX
> > Tel +52 (8)3875346
> > http://www.nic.mx
> >
> > El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor
> > no es apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a
> > NIC-Mexico con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de
> > datos, incluyendo el (los) archivo(s) anexo(s).
>
>--
>Dan Steinberg
>
>SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
>35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
>Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
>J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca