[nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC

["Oscar A. Robles-Garay" <orobles@nic.mx>]

How many responses are you expecting to have with this questionnaire ?
tens? hundreds? thousands?

In case you are expecting something bigger than "tens" I would say to think in the review process and change the initial format for specific questions/answers, it is not easy to read thousands of pages of comments.

Oscar


At 05:34 AM 11/6/2001, DNSO Secretariat wrote:

Secretariat proposal :

May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website, but to post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so that people from the Task force can review the results.
Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail and to fill in the blanks.
Any comments ?

        dnso.org webmaster.

On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the ICANN and
> DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I ask that
> each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and that Danny
> provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and I cannot
> get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to him).   
>
> As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in which we are
> requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was unsure as to
> whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if any format
> changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the repsonse.
> Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor a certain
> list?  Please advise.
>
> Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators can then
> translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat, for
> posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members advise their
> Constituencies and Danny the GA.
>
> Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of Reference, I
> noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November 2-December
> 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be changed to
> "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it posted.
> Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to November
> 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the entry
> should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> teleconference"
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the questionnaire.
> Please remember that our work has only just begun.
>
>
>
>  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>

Top Level Domain .MX     
Tel +52 (8)3875346
http://www.nic.mx

El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor no es apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a NIC-Mexico con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de datos, incluyendo el (los) archivo(s) anexo(s).