RE: [nc-udrp] questionnaire

["Katrina Burchell" <Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com>]

{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\fonttbl{\f0\fmodern\fcharset0 Courier New;}{\f1\fswiss\fprq2 Arial;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\lang1033\f0\fs20\par
I think that we (the task force - is that who you meant?) should also complete it - as we have said before we are not doing statistics from this questionnaire and although we have thought of the questions - I certainly would like to give my answers as well!\par
\par
Katrina\par
\pard\li360\cf0\protect\f1\fs16 -----Original Message-----\par
\protect0\pard\protect\fi-1440\li1800\tx1440\b From:\tab\b0 Dan Steinberg [SMTP:synthesis@videotron.ca]\par
\b Sent:\tab\b0 Monday, November 05, 2001 5:10 PM\par
\b To:\tab\b0 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'\par
\b Subject:\tab\b0 [nc-udrp] questionnaire\par
\protect0\pard\protect\li360\f0\fs20\par
Thanks to Caroline for getting it all together on this tight timeframe.\par
As promised, I will be translating the questionnaire en fran\'e7ais (by the\par
end of the week hopefully).  The process of translating got me thinking.\par
\par
What are everyone's thoughts about panelists themselves responding to\par
the questionnaire?\par
Should we feel obliged to fill out one?\par
Should we consider ourselves barred from comment?\par
Is there some middle ground between the two extremes?\par
\par
Since I was unable to find a " NC-URDP Rules of Procedure" in my library\par
I am unsure how to proceed.\par
Any guidance is appreciated.\par
\par
--\par
Dan Steinberg\par
\par
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology\par
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356\par
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398\par
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca\par
\par
\par
\par
}