Re: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

For this change I will assume it has gone through and make the change in the
french translation.

Suggestion: for any other changes we come across, we should get a batch, and
makes sure the secretariat can implement the changes before making translations.
It would be best to have the translated versions agree with the original rather
than risk jumping the gun.


"Chicoine, Caroline G." wrote:

> Tim, I thought I had fixed it so thanks for catching it.  Can the DNSO
> Secretariat make this change (see below) or do you want me to  make it and
> send a new copy of the entire document?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cole, Tim [mailto:tcole@arb-forum.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: 'Chicoine, Caroline G.'; 'DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org'
> Cc: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'; 'council@dnso.org'
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
>
> Caroline-
>
> I know it may have been difficult to incorporate all of the input you
> received, but at least one of my earlier observations had to do with a
> clearly wrongly-worded question.  This remains in the version you sent
> today.  Question 48 has "respondent" where it should read "complainant."
>
> 48. Should a complainant get a refund on the fee for a three person panel
> requested by the respondent when the respondent defaults and if so, what
> type (i.e., full, partial)?
>
> It should read:
>
> 48. Should a complainant get a refund on the fee for a three person panel
> requested by the complainant when the respondent defaults and if so, what
> type (i.e., full, partial)?
>
> Of course, a defaulting respondent cannot request a three person panel, but
> a complainant who asks for a three person panel may decide to have only one
> person decide the case if the respondent defaults.
>
> Timothy S. Cole
> Assistant Director of Arbitration
> National Arbitration Forum
> 651.604.6725
> 800.474.2371
> mailto:tcole@arb-forum.com
> http://www.arb-forum.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:06 AM
> To: 'DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org'
> Cc: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'; 'council@dnso.org'
> Subject: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
>
> Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the ICANN and
> DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I ask that
> each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and that Danny
> provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and I cannot
> get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to him).
>
> As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in which we are
> requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was unsure as to
> whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if any format
> changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the repsonse.
> Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor a certain
> list?  Please advise.
>
> Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators can then
> translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat, for
> posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members advise their
> Constituencies and Danny the GA.
>
> Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of Reference, I
> noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November 2-December
> 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be changed to
> "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it posted.
> Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to November
> 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the entry
> should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> teleconference"
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the questionnaire.
> Please remember that our work has only just begun.
>
>  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca