<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
Caroline:
Superior work as always. However, I
do have a few comments:
1. In question 31, shouldn't we say
"responses" rather than "answers" just to keep the document
uniform?
2. I have no problem with removing
the factors in 2 or 12. That being said, I think the factors will assist
participants to quickly move through the questionnaire. As for Question
13, I would leave the choices.
3. In the introduction, I note you
removed the information regarding the impracticality of filing multiple
questionnaires. I originally liked it and would not mind seeing it put
back in to the document. I am concerned, however, that any mention of
filing multiple questionnaires might give someone an idea. I will follow
the majority on this issue.
Thanks again for all your hard
work.
J. Scott
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:10
PM
Subject: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review
Questionnaire.DOC
Okay, just running a little behind schedule and also wanted to
run one last draft by you all before sending it to the Secretariat for
posting. Tonight I will be reviewing it for typos and may rearrange
the order of some questions if they seem out of place. I am looking
to you all for substance and any glaring problems I may have missed.
I did my best to take into account everyone's comments over the past couple
of days.
Two questions I would like your input on are questions 2,3and
12. With respect to 2 and 13th, would you all rather we
leave out any choices and simply let them answer the question, or do you
think the choices help get them focused? Question 3 is new (I noticed
after reviewing this several times that we never asked this question and I
thought it was an important questions on which to get feedback)
Question 11 is not new in the sense that Tim mentioned in twice and it
never got picked up.
Thanks for all your input to date. I will
wait until 1 pm central standard time to get any last minute comments and
then finalize it and send it to the Secretariat for posting. Erick
and Dan, once it is posted, I will look to you to translate it and send
your translation directly to the DNSO Secretariat with a copy to nc-udrp@dnso.org.
<<UDRP
Review Questionnaire.DOC>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|