Re: [nc-budget] Regardings changes in the budget

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Hi Roger:

Thanks for clarifying me the situation.   Sadly too late to be agree (I voted
disagree).

By the other hand, and, in the light of this revision of the Budget, still I
propose to review it taking in count real expenses
and then base the new Budget in the real expenses during the year instead of
budget expenses that may happen or may not happen.

What I mean with real expenses is about the items that we are suppouse to do,
but there are not concrete plans to perfom them, and
as the speed that things are going, probably we won't do it during the year
2001.

Best Regards
Vany











"Cochetti, Roger" wrote:

> Vany-
>
> To be clear, the revised budget does NOT increase the DNSO budget for 2001.
> It moves money around among categories by reducing the amounts budgeted for
> Contingency, travel, translations, and professional services, and increasing
> the amounts budgeted for technical services.  The totals remain the same and
> no new dues would result.
>
> Also, the DNSO budgets using a calendar year.  So this budget covers the
> period 1 January through 31 December 2001 [unlike ICANN, which uses a July 1
> through June 30 budget year.]
>
> Hope this clarification helps,
>
> Roger
>
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
> VeriSign
> rcochetti@verisign.com
> (703) 326-2585/202-973-6600
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vany Martinez [mailto:vany_martinez@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:33 AM
> To: nc-budget@dnso.org
> Subject: [nc-budget] Regardings changes in the budget
>
> Hi to all:
>
> The changes Roger is proposing in the Budget affects
> by increasing the Budget for 2001.
>
> Since I cannot commit increasings in the Budget of
> this year (because this would mean more money for us
> to pay, and more money to pay to the NCDNHC means more
> difficult for us to raise such money), then to support
> a proposal of Budget changes might be by keeping the
> Budget as originally it was or decreasing such amount.
>
> There are lines in the Budget that maybe will not be
> even used for this year.
>
> So, my proposal is base any Budget revision based in
> real expenses rather in expenses that we even don't
> know if we will do or not.
>
> Also I have some questions:
>
> 1.  Whoever be the new ISP and Information Manager
> services provider, their payment will be perfomed by
> month, at the end of the year, 50% at the begining and
> 50% by the end?  Because depending on the payment
> method I think that maybe is not necessary to add such
> an expense.
>
> 2.  Which is the Budget Period? (example, from January
> 1rst to December 31)?
>
> Best Regards
> Vany
>
> =====
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
> Information Technology Specialist
> Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
> http://www.sdnp.org.pa e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
>
> Go to http://www.getpaid4.com/cgi-bin/emailpanel.cgi?userid=659401 to
> receive FREE newsletters via email!
> Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?sheharhore to make $$$ using YOUR OWN computer
> and sigining subscribers in YOUR OWN emails!
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa