Re: [nc-budget] Subs enforcement

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

It is my understanding that all constituecies have now promised payment - is this correct?

erica

----- Original Message -----

From: Gomes, Chuck

To: 'Philip Sheppard' ; DNSO budget

Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:42 PM

Subject: RE: [nc-budget] Subs enforcement

Unfortunately, I have come to the point where I think such an approach is the only thing that will work.

 

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 4:57 AM
To: DNSO budget
Subject: [nc-budget] Subs enforcement

FOR INFORMATION before next meeting

 

In case you missed this, Paul Kane included this option in his recent posting to the Council list:

 

Concern over constituency debts - need to offer encouragement for payments - NC reps in difficult position - but there is a duty to ensure dues are paid.

How about having a structure of reducing voting rights eg, 60 public statement Constituency in arrears, 120 days late loose 1 vote, 180 days late lose 2 voting rights, 240 days late Constituency moves to "Observer" status.

Philip Sheppard
AIM - European Brands Association
9  av. des Gaulois  B-1040 Brussels
Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702