<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gatf-nominations] [Fwd: [ga] [Fwd: Mail System Error - Returned Mail]]
hopefully this is the correct address for acceptance.
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
Mail link on the acceptance template page does not appear to be working.
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.
Recipient: <ga-nominations@dnso.org>
Reason: <ga-nominations@dnso.org>... User unknown
Please reply to <postmaster@videotron.ca>
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; VL-MS-MR001.sc1.videotron.ca
Received-From-MTA:dns; videotron.ca (24.203.109.143)
Arrival-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 01:40:11 -0500
Remote-Recipient: rfc822;<ga-nominations@dnso.org>
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;551 SMTP-Deliver:BadRecipient
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.6
Remote-MTA: DNS;dnso.dnso.org
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 01:40:12 -0500
1a. Full name of the nominee: Dan Steinberg
1b. E-mail address of the nominee: synthesis@videotron.ca
1c. Background information about the nominee: Dan Steinberg has been
working on DNS-related issues since 1996. I am currently working on the
UDRP review Task Force. This has proven to be an interesting task and I
have endeavoured to represent the GA. So far nothing has come up that
requires actual 'representation'of a GA perspective but when it does I
will seek guidance.
1d. Statement of the nominee's objectives
in the role as GA delegate to the NC Transfer TF: It is clear that
there is no simple solution here. If there had been one, we would have
rapidly approached it and not needed to set up a task force. My
objective is obviously to represent the GA, but as with the UDRP Task
Force, in order to represent, there must be 'positions'
taken...consensus, vote, whatever. Absent a position to represent, I
will use common sense and my perception of fairness. The procedures for
transfers have to somehow balance the needs of the registrars, the
registries and the customers. Does that sound like I'm avoiding the
answer? perhaps. But I think the only way for the problem to not exist
is to eliminate the whole registrar/registrty structure....and that
would be terribly unfair to the regisrars.
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|