Re: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA antitrust laws

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Dear Mr. Harris,

Funny you should ask this but should not the question be;

Why should any court be prevented from enforcing any law within it's own
boundaries?

little factum - Alaska in it's beginning just went ahead and said we
adopt all of California law, both statutory and case law, with the
following exceptions.......

Check out India and French attempts at control and banning at their
borders, the cases are very intriguing.

Sincerely,
Eric

Sandy Harris wrote:

> Len Lindon wrote:
>
> > In August the Supreme Court of Uruguay at Montevideo will be
> > asked to conclude that:
> > "ICANN's exclusive contracts with Internet Address Providers
> > are exclusionary devices, in violation of the USA Sherman Act."
>
> This appears nonsensical. Why should a Uruguayan court be asked
> to rule on an alleged violation of US law, apparently by an
> Australian?
>
> > In early September antitrust proceedings will be commenced
> > in California at the nearest relevant court to Marina del Rey
> > asking the court to confirm that:
> > "ICANN's exclusive contracts with Internet Address Providers
> > are exclusionary devices, in violation of the USA Sherman Act."
>
> Let us know how that goes.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html