Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Chris and all,

  I agree with your assessment of the past few posts on this thread
from Thomas are of a personal nature towards Leah, rather than
addressing the REAL issue.  However I can understand his frustration.

  Given that Leah and Atlantic Root was first or took over the registry
for .BIZ and therefore has prior claim.  Some folks that wish to
mitigate that FSFC principal are unduly and terribly frustrated.
Indeed that is unfortunate.  But precedence is precedence, and
an operational registry vs non operational "Assigned" one
recognizes that real and non real are at stake here...

NameCritic wrote:

> Since you like the biz subject so much Thomas why not take it back to your
> website. This list is ga-roots@dnso.org but maybe Patrick can start one for
> you called biztld@dnso.org
>
> You have not in your last several posts been helping to talk about standards
> for all TLDs, you have used this forum for your personal gigs at Leah. Think
> that's appropriate?
>
> Taken your comments below would simply be abuse.
>
> Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> To: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
> Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version
>
> > Leah "they've taken away my copy of their .biz - help!" Gallegos
> > wrote:
> >
> > >>>Let me just say that I would prefer to discuss serious issues
> > >>>without the insults and sarcasm attached.  We have not
> > >>>misconfigured anything or pretend anything.
> >
> > I responded:
> >
> > >> I didn't say you have a misconfigured intranet out there.
> >
> > >> I also didn't say you pretend anything.
> >
> > Given Ben Edelman's excellent timeline of your "TLD business", I
> > think I have to say it now: Your version of .biz is nothing more
> > than a toy - and it certainly was nothing more than a toy in
> > November 2000.  Your story that ICANN creates a collision with an
> > "operational TLD" looks like it's a very strong distortion of
> > reality, even when I apply UNREALISTICALLY LOW standards of
> > "operational".
> >
> > Anyway: For economical reasons, you don't have a chance with your
> > .biz. After having read Ben's report, I have to add that this is a
> > good thing.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html