<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-roots] .EU emerges ?
Is this the new .EU ?
http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_3.php?tld=eu&record=NS
The PacificRoot : 204.107.129.2
VueDig Results : Answer = 2 : Authority = 0 : Additional = 2.
eu. 2D IN NS ns1.nameslinger.com.
eu. 2D IN NS ns2.nameslinger.com.
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version
> On 2001-06-18 12:04:50 -0400, L Gallegos wrote:
>
> >The post referred to creation of roots and TLDs, not SLD
> >registrations. There are some three thousand TLDs and several
> >roots that are new and more coming all the time. I am not saying
> >whether this is a good or bad thing, Dass, only that it is
> >occurring.
>
> >It also has nothing to do with whether any of the TLDs will be
> >popular, open, restricted (chartered) or what business models will
> >be utilized. You took the post and changed the focus of the
> >response to refer to SLDs.
>
> That was me, not Dassa.
>
> But anyway, I think that my question concerning the number of
> registrations in your alternative TLD is one which should be
> answered in order to be able to judge your remark on a TLD "rush" -
> because, of course, we could start to count all those misconfigured
> pseudo-intranets which are confusing SLDs and TLDs, and are
> certainly contributing to the TLD zoo. However, this zoo's
> inhabitants are about as uninteresting for any ICANNesque
> deliberations as it can get.
>
> Also, a "rush" of alt.roots (and in TLDs being offered by these
> alt.roots) which doesn't coincide with a corresponding rush of SLD
> registrations under these TLDs very much looks like a rush of
> childish fools trying to play Internic - which is, frankly,
> something ICANN should indeed ignore, and on which even the
> development of a III 3 b policy would be far too much effort and
> honor.
>
> (I suppose that Kent and friends will subsume (almost?) all
> alt.roots in this category.)
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|