<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-roots] The 80/20 Rule
----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
>
> It is not taken in the only area of the dns that ICANN must involve
> itself in.
>
It is widely reported that 80% of all IPv4 equipment never touches what
some people define to be the IPv4 [legacy|toy|government] Internet.
Are you discussing standards for the majority (80%) or the minority (20%) ?
If current trends continue, and more and more of the islands that make
up the 80% become privately connected via 2002:<IPv4>:0000:<IPv8>
and native <IPv8>, this may be one more reason to work on standards
that most of the people can use.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
2002:<IPv4>:0000:<IPv8> vs. 3FFE:<IPv6>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
Is the goal to work on standards that are widely used, or only used
by a narrow part of the population ?
Should people set up separate standards bodies working in the
new address spaces and new TLDs (http://www.New.Net) ?
That may allow the 80% to focus on 100% of their own needs.
As for the 20%, it looks like they are being routed around...
Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
BIZ World
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|