ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] The NC Vote


Danny and all,

  Ok.  Thanks.  Why is this not posted on the DNSO site? Don't you think
it should be?  Just a thought.

  Should we consider voting on this issue from within the GA?  Is
a motion needed?  Please advise.

Danny Younger wrote:

> Jeff Williams asks:  "has there been a registered vote by the NC on this
> issue, and have the stakeholders had the opportunity to vote on this issue?"
>
> >From the scribes notes of the Names Council's Stockholm plenary session:
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/stockholm/archive/scribe-nc-060201.html
> I.   Kane: Proposed motion: The Names Council considers that multiple roots
> are outside the scope of the ICANN DNSO. (Make null and void the prior
> motion).
>    A.   de Blanc: Need to discuss it?
>    B.   Sheppard: Discussed it already. Vote. In favor, 12.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>