<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-roots] MOTION - Consensus-Based Policy on Alt Roots
Hi William
> There is no way anyone could claim that such a proposal has any kind
> of consensus, nor that RFC1591 supports the alt.root claim.
>
> Any effort to try and advance this as a consensus policy would be
> illegitimate.
Perhaps you could re-read the proposal. It is AGAINST alt roots. I cannot
see how ICANN should not wish to foster compliance !!!!!!
With your excellent writing skills, could you suggest how it could be
improved.
Regards
Patrick Corliss
> Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 8:10:52 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > As the role of the DNSO General Assembly is to provide consensus-based
> > policy input to ICANN, I have asked everybody that they think that
> > consensus-based policy should be? I therefore move the following policy
> > should be adopted by ICANN:
>
> > "ICANN adopts compliance with the relevant DNS standards as a general
> > principle. It recognises that there is a likelihood of collision and/or
> > confusion when root operators do not comply with RFC 1591 which suggests
> > that there should be a "unique root zone*. ICANN will therefore adopt
> > methods and measures to foster co-operation and compliance within the
> > industry."
>
> > Any seconders?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|