ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Apology (Re: [ga-roots] Re: Criminalization of alt roots)


At 20:55 06.05.2001 -0400, Gene Marsh wrote:
>Thank you, Harald.
>
>I would also agree that *just* being in an alt.root should not confer
>inclusion in the ICANN root.  However, an operational, proven TLD in an
>alt.root should certainly be considered.  There are several (if not many)
>TLDs that meet this criteria.

With this position, I disagree.

I contend that participation in an "alternate" root proves very little 
about the competence, fairness and committment to stability of the proposed 
operator.

Possibly even less than the ability to pay USD 50.000, fill out ICANN forms 
with a convincing business plan and show up at meetings with a good story 
proves about a proposed operator.

                   Harald

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>