ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Karl's latest


On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Eric Weisberg wrote:

> > Andy Mueller-Maguhn wrote:
>
> >
> > > Exactly this is at least my reason for voting in favour of the
> > > blueprint as at least a less-worse solution then strong governmental
> > > involvement would be.
>
> Is there a point where governments are better able to represent the interests of citizens than
> private, non-membership organizations?

no.  control of the dns resides with the end user.  impossing government
control on the dns would require monopoly - and icann is a false monopoly
- so at best any government representation will end up in the gutter.

granted government intervention at this point will prolong it's life - but
in the end it is end users who are in charge when it comes to root.

regards
joe baptista
www.dot-god.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>