Re: [ga-abuse] M1 Against William Walsh

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

At 01:05 AM 12/5/2001 +0100, Alexander Svensson wrote:

>Hello Kristy and fellow ga-abuse readers,
>
>I think it would be a bit strange to resume
>list monitoring all of a sudden, and to
>enforce it against someone who, as he mentioned
>in previous messages, thinks that the list
>monitors have stopped working.
>
>On the other hand, the message is a clear
>violation of the rules, as you (Kristy) already
>stated.
>
>If we are to resume the work, I would propose
>to make this clear to the list first and therefore
>send William X Walsh a clear warning. Furthermore,
>I would propose that each of us sends *warnings*
>about list rules violations immediately, without
>waiting for complaints: friendly, but clear
>personal e-mails cc ga-abuse. If the list rules
>violations continue after the warnings, we
>recommence our M1/M2 procedures. How does that
>sound?
>
>Again: Before we resume, I think a message to
>the GA list would be appropriate.
>
>Best regards,
>/// Alexander


That sounds/reads perfect.

To avoid duality, let's be sure to CC ga-abuse when sending warnings.

:)