[ga-abuse] RE: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Mr. Meyer,

The five post per day per list limit is still in place.

:)

At 01:04 PM 10/28/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>|> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
>|> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 2:08 PM
>
>|> Roeland Meyer wrote:
>|> > |> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
>|> > |> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 12:45 PM
>|> > |> William X Walsh wrote:
>|> > |> > Sunday, Sunday, October 28, 2001, 12:33:22 AM, Joop
>|> > |> Teernstra wrote:
>|> > |> > > At 17:38 26/10/01 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>
>|> > |> > >>There's also a pretty significant enforcement issue. How
>|> > |> would you propose
>|> > |> > >>to enforce judgements?
>
>|> > |> > > Forfeiture of a Bond in favour of the successful defendant?
>|> > |> > > We can at least *try*.
>|> > |> >
>|> > |> > Ok, so the first step would be for someone to draw up
>|> a document
>|> > |> > detailing changes that would need to be made to the
>|> current UDRP to
>|> > |> > make this happen.  Let's not lose this idea to non-action,
>
>|> > |> > Any volunteers to do that step?
>
>|> > |> What I would like to know however is their a minimum amount that
>|> > |> the bond should be set for?
>|> >
>|> > $50K US should cover most expenses.
>|>
>|>   Perhaps this is a little high, but not unreasonable.
>
>It is reasonable considering the alternative legal costs, but dropping it to
>$25K US is also reasonable, considering that there is no set criteria. In
>the case of an abusive complaint, which is usually brought about by a large
>corp, $25K US is almost a Manager level budget approval, whereas $50K US
>would need Director approval. This helps to forestall abusive complaints
>before they are made. Yet, legitimate complaints can be funded for $5K US,
>through a bonding company.
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html