Re: [ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: Re[4]: [ga] Re: GA/DNSO Funding

[Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>]

Hello William,

both mails you complain about have not (yet?) arrived at
my mailbox and don't appear on the GA Web archive. We will
handle the complaint if they arrive.

Thanks,
/// Alexander

> Not that the monitors seem to act on complaints at all anymore (The
> DNSO list may as well be a free for all like the NSI domain policy
> list was it seems), but in the event someone decides to do their job,
> here is the second act of personal attack (in reply to offlist emails
> if that matters) in one day by this person.

> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo


> The following is a forwarded message:
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =
> From:    NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>
> To:      William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> CC:      ga@dnso.org
> Date:    Wednesday, September 05, 2001, 8:42:56 PM
> Subject: [ga] Re:  GA/DNSO Funding
> --====----====----====----====----====----====----====----====----====----===-
> -
> They can file it with all your other worthless complaints. Again acting like
> the Hall Monitor. Were you one in school? I have repeatedly asked you not to
> private email me at all. Anything I talk about on this ML is public. I have
> repeatedly told you if you email me it will go to the public list.

> Now you havwe cause to complain about this as a personal attack on your
> unquestionable behavior.


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William X Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
> To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:22 PM
> Subject: Re[4]: [ga] Re: GA/DNSO Funding


>> Wednesday, Wednesday, September 05, 2001, 8:12:41 PM, NameCritic wrote:
>>
>> > I did ask. I'll phrase it any way I like and do question the gold fund
> as an
>> > alternative. I have the right to ask the legitimacy of it since more
> than
>> > just my questions have been raised.
>>
>> > I also have seen nothing about forming a proper organization and having
> an
>> > elected board who include a treasurer who collects funds for the
>> > organization. Simply collecting donations without it CAN be illegal. I
> did
>> > not say it WAS illegal.
>>
>> > I also asked to be corrected if I am wrong. I don't remember asking to
> be
>> > chastised and didn't follow anyone's leads. The questions were my own
> and
>> > some were from the news media.
>>
>> "news media" ?

> Yes. News Media as in newspapers, television, radio, the internet. Sorry you
> were not familiar with the terminology.

>>
>> Please, the post was barely on the list when you responded.

> And real slow just for you. E-Gold was covered in the News Media, you do
> still remember the term from the line above I hope, long before it was
> discussed here on this list.

>>
>> Don't over inflate, Chris, its not becoming.

> I quoted articles from website. Hard to overinflate when copying and
> pasting.

>>
>> Consider yourself chastised, again.

> Better yet I'll just consider the source.

>>
>> further, my post was offlist, I'll be sending a complait about your
>> post to ga-abuse, since your post contained material that violates the
>> rules of the GA list.

> Complaint is spelled with an N as in complaiNt. I would hate for them to
> return it to you for incorrect spelling.

> Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>> Userfriendly.com Domains
>> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>>

> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =
> End of original message