[ga-abuse] 8/29 Cases Against Eric Dierker

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

 > M1:  Kristy McKee
 > Date:  8/29/01
 > Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tek.com
 > Complainant:  Kent Crispin, kent@songbird.com
 > Complainant Comment:  I wish to register a complaint about the attached
 > message.  Phrases like "criminally a misrepresentation at least", "you
 > blather on", "tantamount to complicity" etc cannot be construed as anything
 > other than personal attack.
 >
 > URL:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00902.html
 >
 > Injury:  Personal Attack
 > Action:  Warning
 > Comment:  This discussion between Mr. Walsh and Mr. Dierker was
 > hostile.  Both engaged in personal attacks and some of the messages lack
 > relevance to the business of the GA.

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment: Agreed, it is a personal attack.
Action:  (Strong) warning (unless it's pointless due to
action on other pending complaints)

--------------------------------------------------------------
 > M1:  Kristy McKee
 > Date:  8/29/01
 > Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tek.com
 > Complainant:  William Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
 > Complainant Comment:  This is why moderators should be free to act
 > independently.  How long as you going to subject the list to this kind of
 > abuse before acting? The rules NEVER indicated that moderators had to act
 > by committee, this is something you guys created.  All it takes is for you
 > moderators to start acting on your own.  Same violation as before, he is
 > asking to be removed, give him what he wants.
 >
 > URL:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00902.html
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 20:48:14 -0700

 > Injury:  Personal Attack; however, that is not what WXW is complaining
 > about.  His complaint is about the LMCs process.  This is a discussion for
 > the ga-rules list.  Also Mr. Walsh's response to Eric's message should be
 > noted:  "Get some Facts, Eric. You obviously have no knowledge how the
 > systems in question work, when you do, come back and we'll discuss it
 > intelligently."
 > [http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00904.html]  This is a personal
 > attack only.
 > Action:  Ignore

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment: "Same violation as before" seems to indicate
that William Walsh is complaining about the previous
alleged violation: another personal attack. If someone
just sends us the URL, we should reach the same action
as we do when we receive a lengthy, heated explanation.
Action: This complaint is already dealt with, see above:
(Strong) warning.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

M1:  Kristy McKee
Date:  8/29/01
Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tek.com
Complainant:  William Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
Complainant Comment:  ... this one appears to be an intentional disregard.

URL:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-sys/Arc00/msg00185.html
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:54:32 -0700

Injury:  not relevant to the business of the GA
Action:  Warning (already sent 8/26 2:49PM)
Comment: Message lacks relevance to the business of the GA; although he is 
stating an opinion about the LMC process.  We know this belief is not 
correct and have recently mentioned this to him (in a message dated 2:49PM 
8/26) and his response was gracious; although odd.  Also, noticed an 
improvement in the quality of his posts since then.

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment:
Action:
  Kristy McKee 612.823.3958
  .W I D G I T A L.Espware.