Re: [ga-abuse] Pending Suspension

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi Eric

Kristy wrote:

> If a person named in a complaint or making the complaint is also a list
> moderator that person will not participate in the processing of the
complaint.

I am sorry to say that my interpretation is that a list monitor should not
participate in adjudicating a complaint where the list monitor is:

(a)    the complainant, or
(b)    the person being complained about.

In my view, it is not necessary for the list monitor to recuse themselves
merely because they were mentioned, even derogatorily, in the offending
email.

Unless, of course, the list monitor submitted a complaint themselves.

Please note there should be no discussion on [ga-abuse] by you or anyone
else.  I do not wish the list monitors, or indeed myself, to be engaged in
this type of private mail.

Please address any future inquiries to [ga-rules].

Best regards
Patrick Corliss

----- Original Message -----
From: Kristy McKee <k@widgital.com>
To: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
Cc: [ga-abuse] <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Pending Suspension


> At 11:11 AM 8/26/2001 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:
> >Dear Mr. Svensson,
> >
> >In order to bring the GA and ICANN into compliance with WTO and UN
> >International Standards would you be so kind as to publish and make open
> >and transparent my pending suspension from posting rights on the GA list
> >with rules.  It would seem hypocritical that the world require China to
> >remain open and transparent in their dealings with radicals and yet we
> >would allow You and Mr. W---- to discuss my suspension of freedom of
> >speech and expression behind closed doors.  I suppose freedom of
> >assembly belongs somewhere in the mix.
> >
> >If I am wrong and you are not considering such action against me as
> >privately suggested by a third party I apologize but leave my request
> >for openness and transparency intact.  Let us build an Internation
> >together with hopes that all may participate.
> >
> >Quite Sincerely,
> >Eric
>
> Mr. Dierker,
>
> A brief clarification about our process:
>
> If a person named in a complaint or making the complaint is also a list
> moderator that person will not participate in the processing of the
complaint.
>
> Have a great day!
>
> :)
>
> Kristy/for the List Monitors
>