[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: [ga] Best Practices/ who objects?

[William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>]

The following rules apply to content of messages on the GA list:

- The messages must be relevant to the business of the GA
- The messages must observe a minimum of decorum, including:
  - Not indulging in personal attacks, insults or slander
  - Not using offensive language

Flagrant disregard

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo


The following is a forwarded message:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From:    Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
To:      William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
CC:      
Date:    Saturday, August 25, 2001, 11:08:01 PM
Subject: [ga] Best Practices/ who objects?
--====----====----====----====----====----====----====----====----====----===--
We have no list moderators.  Your loose use of language is foul.  We have a sole
monitor.  If language was a creature with rights you would be jailed for abuse.  {and
save you verbiage regarding Kristee being a monitor as this is wasted umph}

Oh and whine to the monitor some more!!

William X Walsh wrote:

> Saturday, Saturday, August 25, 2001, 9:06:36 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Mr. Walsh,
>
> > Most of the time you expound legal principals which are erroneous at best in that
> > you have no legal or legal scholarly training and jump to ridiculous conclusions.
> > Now you jump to research conclusions which reveal a whole new level of ignorance.
> > The research you do not know and I have forgotten could fill a library.
>
> > Show me one sentence in one place where one matter was voted upon that demands
> > suspension.  Just one smart man.  If you can I shall self suspend for 48 hours.
> > You may want to callaborate with Mr Svensson.  the offer remains open for 24
> > hours.  Do not promote vagueness for a taking of a right should be very specific.
>
> No one has claimed that suspensions were mandatory, according to the
> VOTED ON RULES, they are at the discretion of the MODERATORS, subject
> to appeal to the Chair.
>
> No one has said otherwise.
>
> ----------------
> A list monitor may impose 2 sanctions against offenders:
>
> - Monitoring of posts. This will cause delay of postings from the affected
>   individual until a list moderator approves them as being within the content
>   rules, or rejects them
> - Suspension of posting rights. This will cause mail from that person not to be
>   sent to the GA list.
>
> Both sanctions are imposed for a limited period of time (typically 2 weeks),
> and are announced on the mailing list. Repeat offenders may get correspondingly
> longer sentences (for instance 4 weeks for a second offense, 8 weeks for a third).
> The period is decided by the list monitor.
> ------------------
>
> Why you got on this diatribe I do not know.
>
> I will say that I have lodged a complaint with the moderators about
> your message above.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
End of original message