Re: [ga-abuse] M1 against Bill Lovell

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

At 09:34 AM 7/28/2001 +0200, Alexander Svensson wrote:

>M1: Alexander Svensson
>Against: William S. Lovell, wsl@cerebalaw.com
>Complainants:  William X. Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
>Complainant Comments: "Personal attack, and also not
>relevant to the business of the GA. This is a multiple
>theme for this person"
>Date:  27-Jul-01
>Message: http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00118.html
>Grounds: Personal attack, off-topic posting
>Recommendation: Ignore
>
>M1 Comment:
>Both Kent Crispin and Bill Lovell discussed dependence
>on the IETF as a standards-setting body (not off-topic).
>It seems Bill Lovell tries a reductio ad absurdum by invoking
>his ancestry. This is something different from a personal
>attack. I recommend to ignore this complaint.
>
>M2:  Kristy McKee
>M2 Comment:  agree with Alexander
>Action: Ignore
>
>
> > From: William S. Lovell <wsl@cerebalaw.com>
> > To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
> > Date: Friday, July 27, 2001, 4:37:55 PM
> > Subject: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
>
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I look forward to the cessation of your use of email, then, since the 
> design
> >> of the email protocols came straight out of the IETF...
> >>
>
> > Well, I'm going to end this silliness right now.  Mr. Crispin, I look 
> forward
> > to
> >
> > the cessation of  your use of all optics, and all electronic 
> communications,
> > since
> > one of my grandfathers helped put that first branch of physics 
> together, and
> > another one did the second.  And, at least as to the second, they would not
> > like to see such misuse.
> >
> > Bill Lovell
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html