[ga-abuse] M1 against Bill Lovell

[Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>]

M1: Alexander Svensson
Against: William S. Lovell, wsl@cerebalaw.com
Complainants:  William X. Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
Complainant Comments: "7th post for the day for him."
"8th post for the day, and also not relevant to the
business of the GA."
Date:  27-Jul-01
Messages:
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:03:52 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00070.html
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:07:52 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00080.html
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:48:42 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00082.html
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:53:01 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00083.html
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:12:42 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00090.html
  Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:15:45 -0700
  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00092.html
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:39:41 -0700
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00093.html

Grounds: Posting limit violation, off-topic posting
Recommendation: Ignore

M1 Comment:
William X. Walsh seems to have counted a posting too
much. Additionally, one of the messages is a resend of a
message Bill Lovell presumably thought didn't arrive on
the list, which leaves six messages. Two of them are
reactions to a list monitor decision, which are certainly
not off-topic (even though GA-rules may have been more
suitable). Additionally, I think we should make sure
that we do not convey the impression that someone is
lured into a trap by responding to list monitors
decisions. I would therefore recommend to ignore the
complaint.

M2:
M2 Comment:
Action: