[ga-abuse] Fwd: RE: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

After already exceeding his limit, he posted that he was over his
limit, and wouldn't be posting again (which in itself was posting over
his limit).  Then he continues to post, knowingly over the limit, in
flagrant disregard.

You have banned people for less flagrant violations of the rule, if
you don't do the same here, when the criteria you used against me and
others applies even more, then you should resign.

This is a forwarded message
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'k@widgital.com' <k@widgital.com>
Date: Thursday, July 26, 2001, 2:15:03 PM
Subject: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net

===8<==============Original message text===============
> From: k@widgital.com [mailto:k@widgital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:20 PM

> As far as the IETF's credibility:  we all surely recognize it 
> has been 
> suspect for a few years now.

I hope that you all will forgive one last comment on this subject. :\

A fair representation of the onen/closed-mindedness of a group can be
measured by the number of ad hominem responses received upon introduction of
a specific topic.

Example:
        1) login to namedroppers and start discussing multiple root-zone
architectures.
        2) Login to NANOG and discuss same (carefully crafted for
operational context, of course).

In both cases, you will receive a huge number of ad hominem responses that
are virtually free of any technical content. All responses will intimate how
stupid you are for breathing, or worse. But, none of them will type even one
character in defense of their position nor will they read even one line in
opposition to their view. 

This is but one example. There are other topics that are treated that way.

In the case of the unified root school, the arguments required to support
that view are akin to proving that 2+2=4, in calculus. It is amazingly
difficult and no one wants to even try. I am, of course, of the opinion that
it is wrong, a much easier case to prove.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo