Re: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Jim Fleming - Relevance of Posting

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Patrick, I will ignore this complaint as you have withdrawn it.

Jim,  I appreciated reading your comments as well; but don't find any 
reason to pursue this matter further.

Everyone, have a great day!

:)

~k

Kristy McKee, (for the List Monitors)


At 01:42 AM 7/11/2001 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>Hi Jim
>
>**   Please do not reply to this post  **
>
>The GA rules are detailed at the following URL:
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules-v0.4.html
>
>They state, in part, that -
>"The messages must be relevant to the business of the GA"
>
>The wording of my complaint stated that the post had "nothing to do with the
>DNS".  In accordance with the stated rules, my wording should have read that
>it "was not relevant to the business of the GA".  I'm sure you understood
>what I meant quite well.
>
>The post in question was a spam email from a company promoting its website.
>The mail said, amongst other things:
>
> > I need some outside perspective on this site.  I need some outside
> > perspective on this site, improvements, typos, better visuals.
>
> From the sunsequent email, it became clear to me that your purpose in
>posting this email was to bait William X. Walsh.   The fact that the spam
>related to .BIZ was clearly incidental.
>
>In any case, I have mentioned to you many times that your communication
>style is appalling.  If you are trying to make a point with reference to
>.BIZ perhaps you should state it more clearly.  I don't believe that was
>your intention as later debate showed.
>
>In fact the whole thread was a sham quite irrelevant to the content of the
>post.
>
>Under ICANN's Bylaws, the DNSO shall advise the Board with respect to policy
>issues relating to the Domain Name System.  Your post was about a website
>and only indirectly referenced .BIZ.  The only possible policy issue related
>to the lottery.
>
>However, I accept that the reference to .BIZ is sufficient grounds for
>claiming that your post was relevant, albeit indirectly, to the business of
>the General Assembly.
>
>I will therefore withdraw my complaint in this case.  The other complaint
>stands.





>Regards
>Patrick Corliss
>
>On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:41:56 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
> > Please advise on how you conclude that .BIZ has "nothing to do with the
> > DNS".
>
>On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 18:47:34 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
>Subject: [ga] Fw: [azipa] some help needed on dotbizlottery.com
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Marlo Newman" <Marlo@infinetways.net>
>To: "Azipa@Yahoogroups. Com" <azipa@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 6:20 PM
>Subject: [azipa] some help needed on dotbizlottery.com
>
> > Hi folks,
> > On Monday or Tuesday we will go live with http://www.DotBizLottery.com
> > I need some outside perspective on this site, improvements, typos, better
> > visuals.
>
><snip>