<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] Re: [ga-rules] Re: Admin note: I have resigned as list monitor
- To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
- Subject: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga-rules] Re: Admin note: I have resigned as list monitor
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 01:35:48 -0700
- CC: "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <F232JrzdDW6lCPx33E100009582@hotmail.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010704150646.00bae490@pop.clear.net.nz> <3B429C66.1A02EFDD@hi-tek.com> <3B42BFBD.5D9E2763@ix.netcom.com> <133a01c10448$8434e520$b33efea9@hamza> <3B42C721.DE21F242@ix.netcom.com> <148401c1044c$526411c0$b33efea9@hamza>
- Sender: owner-ga-abuse@dnso.org
Patrick and all,
Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Hi Jeff
>
> > I didn't mean to be rude just direct. I am sorry you took my comments
> > as rude. I don't agree that they did a top job. After all didn't we just
> > get done with a call for a poor decision regarding Eric? I think we did.
> > And that is only one of several examples...
>
> Read it again. In allowing Eric's appeal I carefully said that it was no
> reflection on the decision of the list monitors. Just that Eric had
> apologised.
Again I wasn't referring to your part in the incodent regarding Eric.
Please try not to read something into what I stated that is not there, ok?
I said from my comment above: "didn't we just > get done with a call
for a poor decision regarding Eric?" Notice the "WE" in that statement?
That "WE" signifies the DNSO GA participants, not you in particular,
or andy ONE participant Patrick.
>
>
> There are no other examples or you would have quoted them..
>
> > > Nobody could anticipate how many hundreds of
> > > complaints were going to be made. Just look at all the onlist abuse.
> >
> > I don't see that much on list abuse. Than again my opinion of abuse
> > and yours likely differ...
>
> Read it again. You are not subscribed to [ga-abuse] so cannot know how many
> complaints are made. The opinions are those of those making the complaints.
That's right I am not subscribed to the GA-Abuse list. It is a closed
list. However I can get any of the posts to that list, any time I wish to
with the poor security that the DNSO GA server has installed. So you have
no idea what I have read or what I have NOT read... But again I responded
to your comment: "Just look at all the onlist abuse.", not the ga-abuse
list abuse...
>
>
> > The reason(s) are many a varied. But I believe the biggest one is
> > that of inane rules...
>
> The rules say "personal attacks, insults and abuse". What else?
Define what an isult is in the context of a Mailing list? Define what
is a personal attack in terms of a ML and someones comments to it?
Define what is "Abuse" (Boy that is a broad term! ) in terms of
this or any ML in terms that applies to responses or original threads?
IMHO as well a it seems a number of others, the whole list of rules
for this list is rather vague...
>
>
> > > You would say that.
> > Yes I sure would!
>
> But you'd be wrong. People don't like being insulted.
> And it distracts the GA from getting any work done.
>
> Which is one reason we don't achieve anything.
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|