RE: [ga-abuse] personal attacks and threats with more personal attacks

[R.Gaetano@iaea.org]

Dear List Monitors,

For the history, about one year ago I had a long debate with Joop who
replied by offensive postings rather emotionally: I told him that he had to
choose, either to put everything in the hands of the List Monitor, or to
reply and "made justice by himself".
But in the latter case, he had to take responsibility for his actions and
face the possibility of being suspended in turn.

I see that Joop has, much to my satisfaction, consistently taking the first
option and asking for "justice" without emotional reaction. This attitude
relies obviously on the hypothesis that the List Monitors will judge the
case *promptly*. I clearly see that if a judgement does not come within a
couple of days from the fact, people like Joop may revert to option 2, and
that will make the list *really* unmanageable.

Just my 2 cents.

Regards
Roberto

PS: incidentally, I will be off mail in the next 4-5 days



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2001 5:48
> To: ga-abuse@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga-abuse] personal attacks and threats with more personal
> attacks
> 
> 
> Complaint against William  Walsh.
> This posting cited below is an attempt to silence me.
> I am very disappointed that no action was taken against WXW 
> as a result of 
> his previous personal attack.
> Do you really want me to answer all these accusations in detail?
> -JT
> 
> 
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:50:31 -0700
> From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53bis)
> Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Message-ID: <8235478994.20010627185031@userfriendly.com>
> To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
> CC: Steven Heath <Steven.Heath@Optimation.co.nz>, "GA 
> (E-mail)" <ga@dnso.org>
> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Propoganda
> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010628122828.05338760@pop.clear.net.nz>
> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010628122828.05338760@pop.clear.net.nz>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Envelope-To: terastra@terabytz.co.nz
> X-UIDL: d5774ab594d9b5bf1734d5a50209162d
> 
> Hello Joop,
> 
> Wednesday, June 27, 2001, 5:35:00 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> 
>  > At 10:39 28/06/01 +1200, Steven Heath wrote:
>  >>Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz]
>  >>
>  >> >> At 23:07 26/06/01 +1200, DPF wrote:
>  >> >> I have been nominated (and accepted) as a potential GA 
> representative
>  >> >> on the Names Council review Taskforce.
>  >>
>  >> > By whom?
>  >>
>  >>I nominated David Farrar for this position.
> 
>  > Yes, I saw. You must have confidence that David is the 
> right man for the 
> job.
> 
>  > I am waiting for David to reply to the questions himself.
>  > And I have a few more to add about the disappearance of 
> the idno-discuss 
> list.
> 
> I might suggest that you watch your moves.
> 
> I've deliberately minimized my engagements with you, but if you think
> you have any right to grill anyone over IDNO related stuff, then you
> will find yourself on the wrong end of that discussion, in very long,
> very pointed messages containing plenty of URL references.
> 
> Including your own little temper tantrum when you pulled the IDNO
> website and had the mailing list turned off because people were asking
> you to step down (which when you were made aware of how those actions
> were proving your critics right, you claimed were an "error" and had
> them turned back on).
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> Joop Teernstra LL.M.,
> councillor
> InternetNZ
>