[ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker

["Alternate Chair" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Complaint Against Eric Dierker
Breach or Requirement for "Respect"
of the ICANN CEO, M. Stuart Lynn
(1)    Personal Attacks & Insults
(2)    Threats & Offensive Words

My personal feeling is that Eric posts when he is intoxicated or affected by
substance abuse.  Many of his postings are quite incoherent, often
offensive.  As I've said before, they NEVER advance the debate.  In
particular, I object to comments like:

"You are creating the appearance of insincerity"
"you are pissing me and my dot commoner friends off"
"Start getting that straight or I will no longer act in such a gentlemanly
manner"
"Your brain trust would and surely will lose should you chose to defy our
collective wisdom"

And what sort of a joke is this?
> ps. for all those who may take offense, sorry.

I really do believe that it was decided to suspend Eric Dierker before
Stockholm.
Could we action this please?  His continuing attacks are very tiresome.

And we really do look inept by allowing it to happen !!

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: M. Stuart Lynn <lynn@icann.org>
Cc: Bret Fausett <baf@fausett.com>; Milton Mueller <Mueller@syr.edu>;
<webmaster@babybows.com>; <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] Re: ICANN Policy -- revised version


> Dear Mr. Lynn,
>
> You are creating the appearance of insincerity.
>
> In California law they have a model of P&As.  This roughly translates out
to 1.
> your point, 2. your authority for said point & 3. Your argument for said
point.
> Please provide us with such an IRAC model.  You are dealing with very
technical
> policy issues here and failure to be precise is insincere.
>
> Besides that, you are pissing me and my dot commoner friends off, (they
live in
> Texas, Uruguay, Leon, China, Chicago, Russia, Singapore and Vietnam, the
Outback,
> Siberia and Sweden and Paris and London and Zurich- they are shoeshine
boys and
> doctors and taxicab drivers and terrorists and politicians Generals and
privates,
> they are women and children and husbands and grandparents) by making
policy
> behind our backs and then presenting it to us. Is Andrew screening your
emails?
> We make policy from the bottoms up and you enforce it.  Start getting that
> straight or I will no longer act in such a gentlemanly manner.
>
> You are talking here to the General Assembly, perhaps the greatest
grouping of
> caring individuals that has been ammassed since ever * made possible by
the
> internet*. Do you want me to list the names of the witnesses and
participants?
> Your brain trust would and surely will lose should you chose to defy our
> collective wisdom.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> ps. for all those who may take offense, sorry.