[ga-abuse] M2: Eric Dierker

[Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>]

Kristy McKee wrote on 11.06.01, 18:52:06:
> M1:  Kristy McKee
> msg/Injury:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg02563.html
> Complainant/Injured: Kent Crispin/DNSO GA
> Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tech.com
> Comment:  Eric's post broke the first two rules, let's try monitoring his
> posts or another suspension.

I agree that Eric has broken the posting rules.
Harald wrote about post monitoring (7-May-01):
> note that monitored posts are an extremely labor-intensive operation.
> The intent of the possibility was to have a basis for weeding out fake
> postings.
I'm not sure post monitoring would be helpful here.

Eric has been suspended before for two weeks, and
AFAIK the complaints about him from 26-May-01
are still not tackled:
"you bad ass intellectuals mess with our lives"
"Corliss lied about his intentions and is glorified"

I would propose a suspension for both complaints
(i.e. suspend him for four weeks).

Best regards,
/// Alexander



> At 09:28 AM 6/11/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>>I wish to complain about the following message.  The line telling me to
>>"go stuff it", in particular, is offensive.
>>
>>----- Forwarded message from Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com> -----
>>
>>To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
>>CC: ga@dnso.org
>>Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:28:51 -0700
>>From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
>>Subject: Re: [ga] Blending Top-down and Bottoms-up
>>
>>Kent:
>>What you have a problem with is bottoms-up open and transparent
>>truth.  You and
>>your ICANN STAFF cronies can go stuff it.  The only subversion going on
>>here is
>>your desire( that of corporate america) to stifle true representativeness
>>of us
>>dotcommoners.  Your tact is offensive. Your demeanor is a misdemeanor.  You
>>belong elsewhere. Please immediately post again with more rhetoric so I can
>>immediately show it for what it is!
>>
>>with love, Eric, but stay lonesome!
>>
>>Kent Crispin wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Danny Younger wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > It is my opinion that what is needed is a structure by which
>> list/committee
>> > > efforts can be properly organized.  We have a need for
>> Terms-of-Reference,
>> > > for Timelines for preliminary reports and feedback, for Final Reports
>> and a
>> > > vote by the entirety of the General Assembly on the work-product that has
>> > > been put forth; we have a need for the equivalent of a Task Force or an
>> > > ExCom to direct list activities.
>> >
>> > That is, you want to subvert the Names Council.  The things you
>> > describe above are *precisely* what the NC is supposed to do.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
>> > kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>> > --
>> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
>> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
>> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>>----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>>--
>>Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
>>kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain