[ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Re: Restructuring ICANN

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Patrick was not even a member of WG-Review and cannot possibly comment with
any authority on what support Danny had for the WG-Review list. In
fact,Danny was supported by over 100 members of WG-Review and would have
received a great deal of criticism had he not included it.

on 6/8/01 1:14 PM, Patrick Corliss at patrick@quad.net.au wrote:


>> On this occasion, I disagree with Patrick.  Knowing that structural issues
>> were to soon become a major topic of debate, it was decided to set up a
>> discussion list (GA-review) to continue the structural analysis first
>> started in the DNSO Review Working Group.

> Actually I am glad that you attacked me first.  That's twice now.

Danny's comment is not an attack. It is a difference of opinion and what he
is stating is the truth.

 
> I note that you have made another post to GA-REVIEW.  That makes nine
> postings to that list in six weeks.  Four of them were yours.  This can be
> compared with GA-ROOTS which has 704 postings to date.
> 
> Please keep up the good work.  LOL.
> 
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss

The tone of this last paragraph is uneccessarily hostile and could be
regarded as abusive, off-topic, and a personal attack.


Regards,
Joanna