Re: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Jim Fleming

[Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>]

Kristy:

    Since you know Jim, why don't you contact him. Discuss the problem. See if Jim is willing to *tone it down*.   .......:)

/Bruce


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kristy McKee" <k@widgital.com>
To: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
Cc: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:36
Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Jim Fleming


I'm sorry you'all don't understand what Jim is communicating, I simply can 
not accept this as a valid complaint.

If we need to process it, fine; but I strongly recommend we "ignore" this.

~k

Kristy McKee
(a list monitor)

At 11:00 PM 6/6/2001 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>Hi Thomas
>
>The complaint address is [ga-abuse].  This reply includes a copy to that
>address.  The issue can now be dealt with by the List Monitors.
>
>Regards
>Patrick Corliss
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>To: Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>; Patrick Corliss
><patrick@corliss.net>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:37 PM
>Subject: [fwd] [ga-roots] A "Unique" Authoritative.....PROTOCOL ? (from:
>JimFleming@prodigy.net)
>
>
> > I don't seem to be able to find the official complaint address.
> >
> > Anyway, Jim Fleming is on it again, deliberately producing duplicate
> > nonsense posts.  Please consider this a complaint.
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from JIM FLEMING <JimFleming@prodigy.net> -----
> >
> > From: "JIM FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>
> > To: "vint cerf" <vcerf@MCI.NET>, "Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>
> > Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:21:31 -0500
> > Subject: [ga-roots] A "Unique" Authoritative.....PROTOCOL ?
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> >
> > ICANN is structured:
> > 1/3 Protocol
> > 1/3 Address
> > 1/3 Names
> >
> > Claims are made about "Unique" Name Spaces, etc.
> > http://www.icann.org/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm
> > Discussion Draft: A Unique, Authoritative Root for the DNS
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2826.txt
> > IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root
> >
> >
> > Will claims also be made about the need for the world
> > to use a "Unique Authoritative Protocol" ?
> >
> > Is IPv4 the same as IPv6 ?
> >
> > Is IPv4 compatible with IPv6 ?
> >
> > Are there "root servers" for IPv6 ?
> >
> > Are there .COM servers for IPv6 ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Fleming
> > http://www.DOT-NZ.com
> > http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > ----- Forwarded message from JIM FLEMING <JimFleming@prodigy.net> -----
> >
> > From: "JIM FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>
> > To: "vint cerf" <vcerf@MCI.NET>, "Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>
> > Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:34:26 -0500
> > Subject: [ga-roots] A "Unique" Authoritative.....ADDRESS SPACE ?
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> >
> > ICANN is structured:
> > 1/3 Protocol
> > 1/3 Address
> > 1/3 Names
> >
> > Claims are made about "Unique" Name Spaces, etc.
> > http://www.icann.org/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm
> > Discussion Draft: A Unique, Authoritative Root for the DNS
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2826.txt
> > IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root
> >
> >
> > Will claims also be made about the need for the world
> > to use a "Unique Authoritative Address Space" ?
> >
> >
> > The 32-bit legacy IPv4 .ARPA Address space is tiny...
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > 0:0  ARPA
> >
> > The IPv6 128-bit Address Space is huge (and not manageable or efficiently
> > routable)
> > ...a common prefix is 3FFE:
> >
> >
> > The IPv8 64-bit Address Space is "Unique"
> > ...it is routable with the 2002:<IPv4>:0000 IPv8-style Prefix
> >
> > The IPv16 64-bit Address Space is also "Unique" but separate...
> > ...for performance, security, privacy, etc.
> >
> >
> > Will claims also be made about the need for the world
> > to use a "Unique Authoritative Address Space" ?
> >
> >
> > Jim Fleming
> > http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> >