Re: Re[2]: [ga-abuse] Re: complaint

[Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>]

>>I already MADE a complaint<<  >>It was FEEDBACK, Bruce<<
>>would be inappropriate for the list monitors to do.<<

Sorry, William, I don't have the one you sent with the required information.
Would please send it to me again? We are an independent.

Thanks..

Regards,
/Bruce

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
Cc: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: May 23, 2001 21:30
Subject: Re[2]: [ga-abuse] Re: complaint


Hello Bruce,

Can you read?

I already MADE a complaint.  This was not a complaint, it was a post
to the abuse address responding to a complaint by someone else,
explaining why this person thinks that acting on the complaint by Mr
Corliss would be inappropriate for the list monitors to do.

It was FEEDBACK, Bruce.

Can I make it any more clear than that?

Wednesday, May 23, 2001, 7:19:13 PM, Bruce James wrote:

> No William. Would you please forward to us the posting you have in mind.

> As a formal complaint we need a reference for
>> the inflammatory message included in the complaint to handle the
>> complaint.  For example:
>> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-sys/ArcXX/msg0XXX.html.

> Regards,
> /Bruce




> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
> To: "(Kristy McKee)" <k@widgital.com>
> Cc: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
> Sent: May 23, 2001 21:11
> Subject: [ga-abuse] Re: complaint


> Hello Kristy,

> The complaint I was referencing was one that Patrick Corliss (or List
> Admin as he seems to prefer being called these days, I think it helps
> his ego) had made that day regarding Eric Deiker.  The other complaint
> I mentioned was one made by myself against Mr Admin on the GA-Roots
> list for his attack on myself and another list member.  My reference
> was pointing out that if the monitors acted on Patrick's complaint,
> after taking no action against what was a much more clear and direct
> personal attack on the GA-Roots list by Patrick, then they were
> clearly acting with bias.

> Does that clear up any confusion?

> Monday, May 21, 2001, 4:53:16 PM, Kristy McKee wrote:

>> William,

>> To process "RE: Dotcommoners" as a formal complaint we need a reference
> for
>> the inflammatory message included in the complaint to handle the
>> complaint.  For example:
>> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-sys/ArcXX/msg0XXX.html.  If this was a
>> private message and I've written prematurely or without understanding of
>> the complaint in it's entirety, I apologize to everyone; however, if this
>> is not a complaint for the list monitors to handle; then why was the
abuse
>> address included in the post?

>> Thanks,

>> Kristy (one of the DNSO GA List Monitors)
>>   Kristy McKee 612.823.2418
>>   .W I D G I T A L. project dev.



> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net





--
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net