[ga-abuse] Mailing Lists

["Alternate Chair, GA" <patrick@corliss.net>]

To Chair cc DNSO Secretariat, List Monitors

I am sorry but I must reduce the traffic on my email  client.  I am now
getting all of the bounced messages from Jeff Williams and Eric Dierker as
well as those below.  I am also subscribed to all of the sublists as well as
NCDNHC, ICANN-Europe, Domain Policy, OSRC, TLDA and our local DNS.  I also
receive mail from the AUDA and TLDA Boards as well as correspondence with
Elisabeth, Danny and the Monitors.

I am also concerned that we are all working too hard and miss some of each
other's messages.  The lists are under discussion and I feel we are in
danger of losing control of the situation.  We also need to clarify the
procedures between us.

As far as I'm concerned the Chair and the Alternate Chair are in charge of
the mailing lists with the DNSO Secretariat performing the admin function.
I do not really wish to debate every little point as this is a waste of
resources.

(1)    Danny has appointed me as in charge of the lists.  He has set up six
sublists although I suggested five.  I see GA-EXT and GA-REVIEW overlap
considerably.  So far only ONE person has volunteered to be a Chair for any
of the lists.

(2)    All rejected messages are bounced to me as the list owner.  One list
example is <owner-ga-tm@dnso.org>.  There are two types indicated in the
"From":

*    From the list owner.  These are cross-posted messages and they should
bounced back to the sender.  It should be possible to configure in that way.
*    From the Mailer-Daemon (such as below).  These are undelivered mail and
they should be dealt with after 3 days (not one week as previously
suggested).

(3)    Some of the lists still need to get going.  One or two people do not
understand the difference between the lists.  Some, like Jefsey, are
deliberately hostile.  I don't know what's involved but the lists need to be
renamed.  I'd prefer the following:

*    GA-INT should be called GA-RULES
*    GA-EXT should be called GA-ICANN
*    GA-TM should be called GA-UDRP

(4)    The GA-REVIEW list is not being used.  I don't know whether Danny can
get it started quickly.  Who was involved in the "review"?  Who was the
Chair?  If they won't help then the list must be killed off as too
confusing.

(5)    Chairs need to be appointed.  Only one person has volunteered.
That's William S. Lovell for GA-EXT or as I suggest GA-ICANN.  Is there any
possibility that one of the list monitors will take GA-INT or as I suggest
GA-RULES?  Alexander?  Harald?

If we don't sort out these problems quickly we are losing time and energy.

Regards
Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@dnso.org>
To: <owner-ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 9:49 PM
Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable


> The original message was received at Sat, 12 May 2001 13:48:12 +0200 (MET
DST)
> from majordomo@localhost
>
>    ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <ozk@fibertel.com.ar>
>     (expanded from: include)
>
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to mail-hosting.fibertel.com.ar.:
> >>> RCPT To:<ozk@fibertel.com.ar>
> <<< 552 RCPT TO:<ozk@fibertel.com.ar> Mailbox disk quota exceeded
> 554 <ozk@fibertel.com.ar>... Service unavailable
> Message delivered to mailing list owner-ga-roots@dnso.org
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> Return-Path: <owner-ga-roots@dnso.org>
> Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id NAA01572;
> Sat, 12 May 2001 13:48:12 +0200 (MET DST)
> Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net
[151.164.30.28])
> by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA01568
> for <ga-roots@dnso.org>; Sat, 12 May 2001 13:48:10 +0200 (MET DST)
> Received: from a ([64.216.127.132]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net
>  (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10)
>  with SMTP id <0GD800KE70S6CF@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
ga-roots@dnso.org;
>  Sat, 12 May 2001 06:48:08 -0500 (CDT)
> Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 06:48:05 -0500
> From: Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>
> Subject: Re: [ga-roots] Encouraging Rogue Behaviour ?
> To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@corliss.net>, Darryl Lynch <dassa@dhs.org>
> Cc: "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> Reply-to: Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>
> Message-id: <003801c0dad9$6979eb10$847fd840@a>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
> References: <PFEEIKEMONOHLLLBKKEBKEIFFBAA.dassa@dhs.org>
>  <03b301c0da9b$f02de6e0$8ce9fea9@hamza>
> X-Priority: 3
> Sender: owner-ga-roots@dnso.org
> Precedence: bulk
>